IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v47y2021ics2212041620301832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the rise of expenditure reviews as a tool for more effective biodiversity conservation and the protection of ecosystem services

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel, Morrison
  • Craig, Bullock
  • Deirdre, Lynn

Abstract

How much money is being spent on conserving biodiversity? Is it enough? Who is funding national biodiversity conservation and what sort of actions receive the most funding? How can we find synergies between the financing of biodiversity and of ecosystem services? Historically these sorts of questions have been hard to answer. The introduction of the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Resource Mobilisation Strategy with new requirements to monitor finance for biodiversity is, for the first time, driving efforts to track finance for conservation through National Biodiversity Expenditure Reviews (NBERs). In theory, this can help inform strategies to upscale resources for biodiversity conservation. However, NBERs also present methodological challenges, while their value remains untested. Using Ireland as a case study, this paper explores the uses of NBERs, examines their methodological challenges and discusses their potential implications for national biodiversity strategies. The findings reveal that the process of tracking financial flows requires the division of biodiversity finance in a way that may not reflect its complex character. Moreover, the focus on allocation and distribution of finance can be at the expense of understanding the effectiveness of biodiversity spending. Nevertheless, in the context of the promotion of market-based approaches, providing an evidence base for whether, where and when resource mobilisation is needed can be argued to be a step in the right direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel, Morrison & Craig, Bullock & Deirdre, Lynn, 2021. "Exploring the rise of expenditure reviews as a tool for more effective biodiversity conservation and the protection of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:47:y:2021:i:c:s2212041620301832
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620301832
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deniz Anginer & Asli Demirgüç-Kunt & Harry Huizinga & Kebin Ma, 2016. "Corporate Governance and Bank Risk Taking," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Asli Demirgüç-Kunt & Douglas D Evanoff & George G Kaufman (ed.), The Future of Large, Internationally Active Banks, chapter 21, pages 349-370, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. repec:zbw:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201503041096 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamina Chouaibi & Matteo Rossi & Ghazi Zouari, 2021. "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Executive Compensation on Implicit Cost of Equity: Evidence from French ESG Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Aysegul ERTUGRUL, 2023. "Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Insurance Companies with Panel Regression Analysis," Journal of BRSA Banking and Financial Markets, Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency, vol. 17(1), pages 107-130.
    3. Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Rebecca Abraham & Shailesh Rastogi & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu, 2023. "Transparency and Disclosure and Financial Distress of Non-Financial Firms in India under Competition: Investors’ Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Sprenger, Carsten & Lazareva, Olga, 2022. "Corporate governance and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from Russian unlisted firms," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 71-100.
    5. Sara Saggese, 2016. "Governance of Industrial Districts: Bibliometric and Cluster Analyses," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-36, August.
    6. repec:bfv:journl:031 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Oleh Pasko & Fuli Chen & Xuefeng Yao, 2020. "Snapshot and Trends of Corporate Governance Research in the Past 5 Years: Statistics and Visual Analysis Based on CiteSpace," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 120-129, December.
    8. Leviticus Mensah & Murad Abdurahman Bein, 2023. "Sound Corporate Governance and Financial Performance: Is There a Link? Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in South Africa, Nigeria, and Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Sara De Masi & Kose John & Agnieszka Słomka-Gołębiowska & Piotr Urbanek, 2023. "Regulation and post-crisis pay disclosure strategies of banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1243-1275, November.
    10. Marco Meyer & Chun Wei Choo, 2024. "Harming by Deceit: Epistemic Malevolence and Organizational Wrongdoing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 439-452, January.
    11. Sainati, Tristano & Locatelli, Giorgio & Mignacca, Benito, 2023. "Social sustainability of energy infrastructures: The role of the programme governance framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Rajesh Raut & Amruta Deshpande & Kirti Gupta & Natashaa Kaul & Nivedita Ekbote, 2023. "Status of Women in Corporate Governance in the Private Sector Companies in India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 94-107, June.
    13. Badar Alshabibi, 2021. "The Role of Institutional Investors in Improving Board of Director Attributes around the World," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, April.
    14. Maria Vetrova, 2021. "Closed Product Life Cycle as a Basis of the Circular Economy," GATR Journals jber198, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. Victor Dragotă & Camelia Delcea, 2019. "How Long Does It Last to Systematically Make Bad Decisions? An Agent-Based Application for Dividend Policy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-34, November.
    16. Amaury de Vicqde & Christiaan van Bochove, 2024. "Lending a hand: help banks in the Netherlands, 1848–1898," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 28(2), pages 163-192.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:47:y:2021:i:c:s2212041620301832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.