IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v502y2025ics0304380025000249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing ecological sustainability in ion-adsorption rare earth mining areas: A multi-scale model for assessing spatiotemporal dynamics and ecological resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Yaoyao
  • Li, Hengkai
  • Zhang, Zhiwei
  • Ren, Guogang
  • Zhang, Jianying

Abstract

With the increasing global demand for Rare Earth (RE) resources, ionic RE deposits, characterized by a high concentration of medium and heavy RE elements, have become critical to strategic resource planning. These deposits are primarily located in southern China's hilly and mountainous regions, where RE elements are adsorbed onto clay minerals in an ionic state. The deposits are small, scattered, and predominantly mined through solution leaching, a method effective for resource extraction but with severe ecological repercussions, including soil, vegetation, and water degradation. Currently, quantitative assessment methods for evaluating the Ecological carrying capacity (ECC) of ionic RE mining areas on a regional scale remain limited. To address this gap, this paper presents an ECC evaluation model based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, tailored specifically for ionic RE mining areas. Twenty-two ecological indicators were selected to capture the unique environmental conditions of these sites, forming a comprehensive ECC evaluation model applicable to ion-adsorbed RE mining areas. Using Lingbei in Dingnan County, China, as a case study, we conducted a long-term dynamic analysis of the mining area's ECC and employed geospatial analysis to identify the key drivers and their multidimensional interactions across various periods, examining the evolution patterns of critical ecological factors. The results reveal that: (1) from 2000 to 2020, the ECC of the Lingbei RE mining area exhibited a general trend of initial decline followed by improvement. From 2000 to 2010, ECC consistently declined, with moderate ECC zones shifting to poor categories. Since 2010, however, ECC has gradually improved, with the poor ECC zones recovering to moderate levels by 2020. (2) Throughout 2000–2020, vegetation cover (S1) was consistently the primary driver of ECC in the mining area. Early-stage ecological degradation was driven primarily by vegetation loss and desertification (P3), with additional impacts from climatic factors such as surface heat (D3) and precipitation (D5). After 2010, vegetation recovery contributed to improved ECC, while pressures from desertification and climate stress eased. Contributions from biodiversity (S4) and soil organic matter (S3) also increased, and interactions between any two factors had a significantly greater effect on ECC than single factors alone. This study highlights the critical role of vegetation recovery and environmental interactions in improving the ECC of ionic RE mining areas. The findings provide insights into key drivers and pressures, offering guidance for mitigating environmental degradation and promoting sustainable development in RE mining regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Yaoyao & Li, Hengkai & Zhang, Zhiwei & Ren, Guogang & Zhang, Jianying, 2025. "Enhancing ecological sustainability in ion-adsorption rare earth mining areas: A multi-scale model for assessing spatiotemporal dynamics and ecological resilience," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 502(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:502:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025000249
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025000249
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:502:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025000249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.