IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v501y2025ics030438002400382x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extreme capital breeding for giants: Effects of body size on humpback whale energy expenditure and fasting endurance

Author

Listed:
  • Christiansen, Fredrik
  • Madsen, Peter T
  • Andrews-Goff, Virginia
  • Double, Mike C
  • How, Jason R
  • Clapham, Phil
  • Ivashchenko, Yulia
  • Tormosov, Dmitry
  • Sprogis, Kate R

Abstract

Baleen whales are extreme capital breeders, capable of fasting for more than half a year while migrating thousands of kilometres and nursing rapidly growing offspring that quadruple in body size over the same period. To understand this energetic conundrum, bioenergetic models that quantify the energy expenditure of baleen whales relative to their body energy reserves (body condition) are required. However, due to the difficulty in measuring the physiology and bioenergetics of large whales, few empirically informed models are available. Here we develop a bioenergetic model for humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off Western Australia to quantify their daily and seasonal energy expenditure over the breeding season. Specifically, we hypothesised that body size (length) would have a negative effect on the mass-specific energy expenditure of whales, and reduce female reproductive costs. A larger body size would also increase the absolute energy reserves, and hence fasting ability of humpback whales. To test this, we used a unique combination of field methodologies, including behavioural focal follows, aerial photogrammetry, and satellite tagging. To quantify the daily energetic cost of body maintenance, activity, somatic growth, and reproduction (gestation and lactation), we combined fine-scale behavioural and body morphometric data. Seasonal energy loss was estimated from changes in body condition, using aerial photogrammetry data. Migration timing and swim speed were calculated from satellite tag movement data. The resulting bioenergetic model showed that body size had a strong negative effect on the mass-specific energy expenditure of whales, and a positive effect on the fasting ability and residency time of juveniles and adults. Maternal body size had a positive effect on calf birth size and growth, so that calves of larger females reached their departure size quicker and begin their migration back to the Antarctic feeding grounds. The body condition loss during the breeding season declined with body size for juveniles (26.9-14.4%) and lactating females (28.3-7.8%), while adults maintained a constant loss (14.4-15.0%) by increasing their residency time. The ability of humpback whales to support such high seasonal energetic costs with only stored energy reserves highlights the energetic benefits that gigantism provides in these extreme capital breeders.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiansen, Fredrik & Madsen, Peter T & Andrews-Goff, Virginia & Double, Mike C & How, Jason R & Clapham, Phil & Ivashchenko, Yulia & Tormosov, Dmitry & Sprogis, Kate R, 2025. "Extreme capital breeding for giants: Effects of body size on humpback whale energy expenditure and fasting endurance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s030438002400382x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002400382X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s030438002400382x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.