IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v491y2024ics0304380024000863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variable importance and scale of influence across individual scottish wildcat hybrid habitat models

Author

Listed:
  • Cushman, S.A.
  • Kilshaw, K.
  • Kaszta, Z.
  • Campbell, R.D.
  • Gaywood, M.
  • Macdonald, D.W.

Abstract

Understanding the scale dependence of species-habitat relationships is an important area of research in species distribution modeling. There has been little research focused on how habitat selection may depend on individual variation among organisms, geographical location and ecological context of that location. Furthermore, little is known about the extent and drivers of heterogeneity of scale dependence among individuals of a species inhabiting different ecological contexts, and few studies have compared scale dependence and variable importance in a spatially replicated framework. Two of the most important factors for interpreting habitat relationships models include: (1) the relative importance of variables in the model and (2) the spatial scale at which each variable has the largest influence. Based on the existing evidence we hypothesize a priori that landcover variables will generally be the most important predictors, followed by topography, then soil type (which influence both vegetation and prey), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) as an indicator of total vegetation density and perhaps a proxy for prey density, vegetation cover and rabbit abundance. We also expected a priori that there would be consistent patterns of scale dependence across individual wildcat hybrid models related to different variable groups. We expected topographical features to be selected at broad scales, as they influence broad-scale climatic and ecological conditions. We also expected that land cover classes and vegetation cover density to be selected at relatively broad scales given past research showing land cover generally influences habitat selection at relatively broad scales. We expected NDVI and soil type to be selected at finer scales, as their variation influences the distribution of resources and limiting conditions within landscapes. Finally, we expected that rabbit abundance and linear features would affect wildcat hybrid occurrence at the finest scales, given these are resources and conditions that vary over short distances and strongly influence wildcat and wildcat hybrid behavior and habitat use. Our results were consistent with the hypothesis that there may be consistency regarding which variables or variable groups are most important as predictors of wildcat hybrid occurrence in Scotland. Based on previous research we expected that there would be consistent patterns of scale dependence across individual wildcat hybrid models related to different variable groups. Finally, our results identify a clear and consistent trend of increasing frequency of inclusion of variables at increasingly broad scales. This is a linear trend in frequency of variables retained increasing as the scale increased. This suggests a consistent and monotonic pattern of more frequent retention of variables at increasingly broad scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Cushman, S.A. & Kilshaw, K. & Kaszta, Z. & Campbell, R.D. & Gaywood, M. & Macdonald, D.W., 2024. "Variable importance and scale of influence across individual scottish wildcat hybrid habitat models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:491:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024000863
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024000863
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:491:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024000863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.