IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v473y2022ics0304380022001764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing bivalve growth using bio-energetic models

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Tjui Yeuw
  • Miraldo, Marcel Câmara
  • Fontes, Roberto Fioravanti Carelli
  • Vannucchi, Fabio Stucchi

Abstract

Aquaculture can play a key role in providing sustainable and low-cost protein sources, with the potential to help particularly the socially and economically vulnerable population. Although many coastal populations already complement their diet by extracting wild brown mussels (Perna perna, Mytilidae) from the environment, an explicit assessment for mussel growth potential along the Brazilian coast has been conspicuously lacking. We provide a large-scale assessment for prospecting and developing mussel culture by applying a Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) model coupled with remote sensing. We estimated DEB parameters for the P. perna Brazilian population and used satellite-derived yearly data was used as forcing variables, containing information of chlorophyll-a concentration as a proxy for food concentration, sea-surface temperature to modulate metabolic performance, and particulate organic carbon - discounted the contribution of chlorophyll-a - to take into account the negative effect of particles in the mussel ingestion rates. We then simulated mussel growth along a large region of the Brazilian coast and obtained the time it takes for the mussel to reach a 5 cm market-relevant length within each pixel as a means to visualize mapped mussel growth potential indicating the time it takes to reach commercial length. Our results highlight the regions where mussel growth can be relevant for supporting subsistence livelihoods and also for securing income for local communities by performing economic activities, as many of the identified regions do not yet have active mussel culture sites. We also show that mussels can be used for ecosystem services in regions where farming for human consumption is not advisable. Our study provides further evidence that bioenergetic models coupled with remote sensing allow for a pragmatic and cost-effective path to assess growth performance along large regions with implications for developmental policy and spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Tjui Yeuw & Miraldo, Marcel Câmara & Fontes, Roberto Fioravanti Carelli & Vannucchi, Fabio Stucchi, 2022. "Assessing bivalve growth using bio-energetic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:473:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001764
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mayer-Pinto & Barbara L Ignacio & Maria T M Széchy & Mariana S Viana & Maria P Curbelo-Fernandez & Helena P Lavrado & Andrea O R Junqueira & Eduardo Vilanova & Sérgio H G Silva, 2012. "How Much Is Too Little to Detect Impacts? A Case Study of a Nuclear Power Plant," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Yurek, Simeon & Eaton, Mitchell J. & Lavaud, Romain & Laney, R. Wilson & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Pine, William E. & La Peyre, Megan & Martin, Julien & Frederick, Peter & Wang, Hongqing & Lowe, Michael , 2021. "Modeling structural mechanics of oyster reef self-organization including environmental constraints and community interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    3. Crowder, Larry & Norse, Elliott, 2008. "Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 772-778, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merrie, Andrew & Olsson, Per, 2014. "An innovation and agency perspective on the emergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 366-374.
    2. Okadera, Tomohiro & Geng, Yong & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Dong, Huijuan & Liu, Zhu & Yoshida, Noboru & Kanazawa, Takaaki, 2015. "Evaluating the water footprint of the energy supply of Liaoning Province, China: A regional input–output analysis approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 148-157.
    3. Lu, Wen-Hai & Liu, Jie & Xiang, Xian-Quan & Song, Wei-Ling & McIlgorm, Alistair, 2015. "A comparison of marine spatial planning approaches in China: Marine functional zoning and the marine ecological red line," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 94-101.
    4. Frazão Santos, Catarina & Domingos, Tiago & Ferreira, Maria Adelaide & Orbach, Michael & Andrade, Francisco, 2014. "How sustainable is sustainable marine spatial planning? Part I—Linking the concepts," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 59-65.
    5. Maurizio Sajeva & Marjo Maidell & Jonne Kotta, 2020. "A Participatory Geospatial Toolkit for Science Integration and Knowledge Transfer Informing SDGs Based Governance and Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Willsteed, Edward A. & Jude, Simon & Gill, Andrew B. & Birchenough, Silvana N.R., 2018. "Obligations and aspirations: A critical evaluation of offshore wind farm cumulative impact assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2332-2345.
    8. Wenjia Hu & Weiwei Yu & Zhiyuan Ma & Guanqiong Ye & Ersha Dang & Hao Huang & Dian Zhang & Bin Chen, 2019. "Assessing the Ecological Sensitivity of Coastal Marine Ecosystems: A Case Study in Xiamen Bay, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Caldow, Chris & Monaco, Mark E. & Pittman, Simon J. & Kendall, Matthew S. & Goedeke, Theresa L. & Menza, Charles & Kinlan, Brian P. & Costa, Bryan M., 2015. "Biogeographic assessments: A framework for information synthesis in marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 423-432.
    10. Kelly, Christina & Ellis, Geraint & Flannery, Wesley, 2018. "Conceptualizing change in marine governance: Learning from Transition Management," MarXiv 649en, Center for Open Science.
    11. Carolyn K Robb, 2014. "Assessing the Impact of Human Activities on British Columbia’s Estuaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Kimberly Baldwin & Robin Mahon & Patrick McConney, 2013. "Participatory GIS for strengthening transboundary marine governance in SIDS," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(4), pages 257-268, November.
    13. Brennan, Jonathon & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim & Raggatt, Laura, 2014. "EU marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) and marine spatial planning (MSP): Which is the more dominant and practicable contributor to maritime policy in the UK?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 359-366.
    14. Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Mari-Isabella Stan & Dragoş-Florian Vintilă, 2021. "Why Should Fisheries and Agriculture Be Considered Priority Domains for Maritime Spatial Planning in the Black Sea? A Stakeholder Perspective," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 12-20, December.
    15. Shucksmith, Rachel J. & Kelly, Christina, 2014. "Data collection and mapping – Principles, processes and application in marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 27-33.
    16. Kendra Ryan & Andy Danylchuk & Adrian Jordaan, 2018. "Is Marine Spatial Planning Enough to Overcome Biological Data Deficiencies?," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Xiaolu Huang & Jishun Yan & Guangshuai Zhang & Jie Huang & Quanming Wang & Binyong Li & Yu Ma, 2023. "Marine Ecological Function Zoning and Management Countermeasures: A Case Study of the Sea Area of Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Lu, Shiau-Yun & Shen, Cheng-Han & Chiau, Wen-Yan, 2014. "Zoning strategies for marine protected areas in Taiwan: Case study of Gueishan Island in Yilan County, Taiwan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-29.
    19. Elizabeth A Fulton & Anthony D M Smith & David C Smith & Penelope Johnson, 2014. "An Integrated Approach Is Needed for Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management: Insights from Ecosystem-Level Management Strategy Evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Ibrahim Issifu & Ilyass Dahmouni & Iria García-Lorenzo & U. Rashid Sumaila, 2024. "Economics in Marine Spatial Planning: A Review of Issues in British Columbia and Similar Jurisdictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:473:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.