IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v471y2022ics0304380022001673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating monitoring and optimization modeling to inform flow decisions for Chinook salmon smolts

Author

Listed:
  • Wohner, Patti J
  • Duarte, Adam
  • Wikert, John
  • Cavallo, Brad
  • Zeug, Steven C
  • Peterson, James T

Abstract

Monitoring is usually among the first actions taken to help inform recovery planning for declining species, but these data are rarely used formally to inform conservation decision making. For example, Central Valley Chinook salmon were once abundant, but anthropogenic activities have led to widespread habitat loss and degradation resulting in significant population declines. Monitoring data suggest survival through the southern Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, in particular, may be a limiting factor for juvenile Chinook salmon outmigrating from the San Joaquin River and its tributaries. However, survival and routing monitoring data have not been formally used to inform water management in a decision analytic framework. Here, we illustrate how estimates derived from disjunct monitoring data can be used to inform water management and as a basis for adaptively managing flows. We aggregated a meta-analysis of Chinook salmon smolt survival and routing estimates through the south Delta with other sources of data to develop a survival and routing simulation model to estimate optimal flows for the San Joaquin River during smolt outmigration from February–May. We found that large flow pulses at predictable times during the spring are projected to be optimal for increasing Chinook salmon smolt survival to the San Francisco Bay and that optimal scenarios differed somewhat with water year type. Sensitivity analysis revealed temperature and smolt outmigration timing are driving optimal pulse distribution and that water allocation changes little with parameter uncertainty. This case study highlights the utility of the decision-analytic framework for solving conservation problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wohner, Patti J & Duarte, Adam & Wikert, John & Cavallo, Brad & Zeug, Steven C & Peterson, James T, 2022. "Integrating monitoring and optimization modeling to inform flow decisions for Chinook salmon smolts," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:471:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. D. Lebreton & R. Pradel Cefe, 2002. "Multistate recapture models: Modelling incomplete individual histories," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 353-369.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy J. Miller & Per K. Andersen, 2008. "A Finite-State Continuous-Time Approach for Inferring Regional Migration and Mortality Rates from Archival Tagging and Conventional Tag-Recovery Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1196-1206, December.
    2. Roger Pradel, 2005. "Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 442-447, June.
    3. J. A. Dupuis, 2002. "Prior distributions for stratified capture-recapture models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 225-237.
    4. Dalton J. Hance & Russell W. Perry & John M. Plumb & Adam C. Pope, 2020. "A temporally stratified extension of space‐for‐time Cormack–Jolly–Seber for migratory animals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 900-912, September.
    5. Gimenez, Olivier & Rossi, Vivien & Choquet, Rémi & Dehais, Camille & Doris, Blaise & Varella, Hubert & Vila, Jean-Pierre & Pradel, Roger, 2007. "State-space modelling of data on marked individuals," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 431-438.
    6. Rondon, Diego & Mäntyniemi, Samu & Aspi, Jouni & Kvist, Laura & Sillanpää, Mikko J., 2024. "A Bayesian multi-state model with data augmentation for estimating population size and effect of inbreeding on survival," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    7. Etterson, Matthew A. & Ellis-Felege, Susan N. & Evers, David & Gauthier, Gilles & Grzybowski, Joseph A. & Mattsson, Brady J. & Nagy, Laura R. & Olsen, Brian J. & Pease, Craig M. & van der Burg, Max Po, 2011. "Modeling fecundity in birds: Conceptual overview, current models, and considerations for future developments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2178-2190.
    8. Choquet, Rémi & Garnier, Alexandre & Awuve, Edem & Besnard, Aurélien, 2017. "Transient state estimation using continuous-time processes applied to opportunistic capture–recapture data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 157-163.
    9. Caswell, Hal & Shyu, Esther, 2012. "Sensitivity analysis of periodic matrix population models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 329-339.
    10. Taylor, Rebecca L. & Himes Boor, Gina K., 2012. "Beyond the robust design: Accounting for changing, uncertain states and sparse, biased detection in a multistate mark-recapture model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 73-80.
    11. Shirley Pledger & Edward Baker & Kim Scribner, 2013. "Breeding Return Times and Abundance in Capture–Recapture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 991-1001, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:471:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.