IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v462y2021ics0304380021003276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Macro-symbiosis triggered by a defence-reproduction tradeoff in a social insect

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigues, Vinícius Barros
  • Tuci, Elio
  • Holstein, Horst
  • Bowen, Miriam S.
  • Costa, Diogo Andrade
  • Takahashi, Lucy T.
  • Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe
  • DeSouza, Og

Abstract

Symbiotic associations underlie hierarchical evolutionary transitions being crucial to understanding biological complexity. But which proximate triggers promote the first successful contact between guests and their hosts? We tackle this problem, studying the macro-symbiotic model system comprised by two termite species (Blattodea: Isoptera) cohabiting termitaria as a host and its obligatory inquiline. We tested the hypothesis that ergonomic adjustments in resource allocation force termite colonies to trade current defence for future reproduction, thence easing inquiline infiltration. To do so, we combined mathematical modelling and field bioassays. Initially, we created a dynamic model to inspect colony’s resource allocation as a result of the competition between a physical “defence specialist” caste (soldiers) competing for resources with a reproductive caste (alates) and with a physical resource-gatherer specialist caste (workers). This model differs from Oster & Wilson’s “bang–bang” model by the explicit inclusion of solders as a physical defence specialist. Then, we sought empirical support for the end results of our model (i) censusing the population and (ii) measuring the patrolling efforts by soldiers, in 154 mature field termite colonies along a year-long reproductive season. Finally, we verified in the field whether reproducing termite colonies would be more likely to house inquilines than colonies still not at reproductive stage. Modelling and field results matched closely, supporting our hypothesis. Inquiline termites (Inquilinitermes microcerus) sneaked into nests of host termites (Constrictotermes cyphergaster) as these latter colonies undergone a defence-reproduction tradeoff. As the host colony entered reproduction, their soldier numbers and patrolling waned, enhancing the proneness of infiltration by obligatory inquilines. Our results indicate that defence-reproduction tradeoffs, more than a strategy to optimise resource use, can be important initiators of symbioses by loosening self/non-self discrimination and enhancing tolerance. We speculate that, if changes in the internal stasis of an organism or superorganism can enhance tolerance, it could be invoked to explain why symbioses are frequently enhanced by stress and disturbance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigues, Vinícius Barros & Tuci, Elio & Holstein, Horst & Bowen, Miriam S. & Costa, Diogo Andrade & Takahashi, Lucy T. & Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe & DeSouza, Og, 2021. "Macro-symbiosis triggered by a defence-reproduction tradeoff in a social insect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 462(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:462:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021003276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021003276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:462:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021003276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.