IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v429y2020ics0304380020301769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mate success affects sex ratio strategies in structured population

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xin
  • Zhao, Lan
  • Wang, Rui-Wu
  • Fang, Sheng-Guo

Abstract

In this model, we considered the population density effect based on the evolutionary maintainable strategy (EMS) for optimal sex ratio strategy analysis, instead of the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) under the population equilibrium. We used a cellular automaton model to simulate population dynamics using the birth-death process to monitor the effect of space structure on the optimal sex ratio in EMS.The simulation showed that when the whole population was a panmixia, the optimal sex ratio would be 1:1 (male/female), which conforms to the Fisher's theory prediction. However, in a structured population, the ratio favoured a female-bias sexratio, which conforms to the local mate competition theory prediction. With the decreased dispersal range, the sex ratio strategy tended towards a higher male proportion, which is similar to the local resource competition prediction.The predictions of our model partly conformed to classical theories and explained some gaps in the ESS model. However, the driving force differed from the classical sex ratio model.The sex ratio was selected by population fitness rather than mother's fitness. The optimal sex ratio strategy for a population is to guarantee mating success, indicating that population survival may provide a complementary explanation for the sex ratio evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xin & Zhao, Lan & Wang, Rui-Wu & Fang, Sheng-Guo, 2020. "Mate success affects sex ratio strategies in structured population," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:429:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301769
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020301769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:429:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.