IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v422y2020ics0304380020300594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating spatio-temporal dynamics of multiple fisheries-targeted populations simultaneously: A case study of the Bohai Sea ecosystem in China

Author

Listed:
  • Guan, Lisha
  • Shan, Xiujuan
  • Jin, Xianshi
  • Gorfine, Harry
  • Yang, Tao
  • Li, Zhongyi

Abstract

Development of joint species distribution models allows for improved and simultaneous estimates of various metrics for evaluating spatio-temporal patterns in multi-population dynamics, as essential tools for promoting ecosystem management and conservation. However, such tools are rarely used to simultaneously evaluate the spatio-temporal dynamics of multiple fisheries-targeted populations in an ecosystem. This study aims to fill this gap with a case study of the Bohai Sea in China. A joint dynamic species distribution model was developed to estimate the distributions of 13 major fish and invertebrate populations in the Bohai Sea, using data from bottom trawl surveys conducted in spring during 2014 to 2018. We calculated the spatial ranges (i.e., the distance within which correlation coefficients between locations are always larger than 10%) for spatial variation and spatio-temporal variation in species-specific densities of this fished community. The model-based density estimates for these populations were used to calculate the mean center of density, effective area occupied, and total abundance index for each population by year. Results showed that the spatial ranges were respectively 84 km and 94 km for spatial and spatio-temporal variation in the distributions of targeted populations, suggesting large variability in the community structure at a distance >100 km. Fish populations showed larger fluctuations in the mean center of density and effective area occupied than crustaceans and cephalopods, while most of the 13 populations tended to shift northeastward to deeper waters over the five years. Additionally, 12 of the 13 populations showed a sharp increase in total abundance in the spring of 2017 under the force of increasingly conservational fisheries management since 2017. In 2018, the total abundance indices remained high for most fish populations, but showed an abrupt decrease for all six of the invertebrate populations. These results indicate that major fish and invertebrate populations in a simplified ecosystem could differ in their responses to habitat changes, management or other human activities in a rapid manner, suggesting a demand for adaptive fisheries management at system scale for degraded/declining ecosystems worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan, Lisha & Shan, Xiujuan & Jin, Xianshi & Gorfine, Harry & Yang, Tao & Li, Zhongyi, 2020. "Evaluating spatio-temporal dynamics of multiple fisheries-targeted populations simultaneously: A case study of the Bohai Sea ecosystem in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 422(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:422:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020300594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020300594
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heymans, Johanna J. & Tomczak, Maciej T., 2016. "Regime shifts in the Northern Benguela ecosystem: Challenges for management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 151-159.
    2. Zhang, Yuying & Chen, Yong, 2007. "Modeling and evaluating ecosystem in 1980s and 1990s for American lobster (Homarus americanus) in the Gulf of Maine," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 475-489.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    2. Nuttall, M.A. & Jordaan, A. & Cerrato, R.M. & Frisk, M.G., 2011. "Identifying 120 years of decline in ecosystem structure and maturity of Great South Bay, New York using the Ecopath modelling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(18), pages 3335-3345.
    3. Heymans, Johanna Jacomina & Coll, Marta & Link, Jason S. & Mackinson, Steven & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Walters, Carl & Christensen, Villy, 2016. "Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 173-184.
    4. Fu, Caihong & Travers-Trolet, Morgane & Velez, Laure & Grüss, Arnaud & Bundy, Alida & Shannon, Lynne J. & Fulton, Elizabeth A. & Akoglu, Ekin & Houle, Jennifer E. & Coll, Marta & Verley, Philippe & He, 2018. "Risky business: The combined effects of fishing and changes in primary productivity on fish communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 265-276.
    5. Ocampo Reinaldo, Matías & Milessi, Andrés C. & Romero, María Alejandra & Crespo, Enrique & Wolff, Matthias & González, Raúl A., 2016. "Assessing the effects of demersal fishing and conservation strategies of marine mammals over a Patagonian food web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 31-43.
    6. Morales-Zárate, M.V. & Lluch-Cota, S.E. & Serviere-Zaragoza, E. & del Próo, S. Guzmán, 2011. "Modeling an exploited rocky coastal ecosystem: Bahia Tortugas, Mexico," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1185-1191.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:422:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020300594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.