IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v338y2016icp122-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a GIS-tool to evaluate potential eelgrass reestablishment in estuaries

Author

Listed:
  • Flindt, Mogens R.
  • Rasmussen, Erik K.
  • Valdemarsen, Thomas
  • Erichsen, Anders
  • Kaas, Hanne
  • Canal-Vergés, Paula

Abstract

The lacking recovery of eelgrass (Zostera marina) has been observed in many coastal areas throughout the world. Through a strategic field project we managed to characterize and quantify the impact of new and already known stressors and their thresholds on the recovery process. The stressing mechanisms were 1) Physical stress from wave and current action 2) low sediment anchoring capacity facilitate uprooting of eelgrass seedlings; 3) benthic light intensity 4) ballistic stress from drifting macroalgae are damaging seedlings, 5) too frequent resuspension impoverishing the benthic light climate and dispersing seeds to deeper areas not sufficiently supported with light, 6) lugworms burial of seeds, and uprooting or burial of seedlings. Based on the field and supporting laboratory studies we present a GIS-tool that from data on a suite of stressors are able to predict potential areas for recovery of eelgrass by transplantation actions and seed broadcast. Input data may be field data or model simulation results. Here we have used model results. These input data were reclassified into 5 ranges, according to how much it impacted the eelgrass recovery process: 1) Optimal recovery, 2) Good recovery, 3) Threshold for recovery, 4) Poor recovery and 5) Very poor recovery. Afterward a weighed overlay function was performed, ending up with an accumulated value for stress impact on the eelgrass recovery process in all location in the Danish estuary, Odense Fjord. The GIS-tool is able to calculate and visualize areas of individual and/or multi-stress situations at specific locations. It also managed to identify potential recovery area at the present loading and after a 30% reduction of the external nitrogen loading of the system. Further validation by field activities is needed to verify the precision of the tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Flindt, Mogens R. & Rasmussen, Erik K. & Valdemarsen, Thomas & Erichsen, Anders & Kaas, Hanne & Canal-Vergés, Paula, 2016. "Using a GIS-tool to evaluate potential eelgrass reestablishment in estuaries," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 122-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:338:y:2016:i:c:p:122-134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016302472
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Canal-Vergés, Paula & Petersen, Jens K. & Rasmussen, Erik K. & Erichsen, Anders & Flindt, Mogens R., 2016. "Validating GIS tool to assess eelgrass potential recovery in the Limfjorden (Denmark)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 135-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Canal-Vergés, Paula & Petersen, Jens K. & Rasmussen, Erik K. & Erichsen, Anders & Flindt, Mogens R., 2016. "Validating GIS tool to assess eelgrass potential recovery in the Limfjorden (Denmark)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 135-148.
    2. Kuusemäe, Kadri & von Thenen, Miriam & Lange, Troels & Rasmussen, Erik Kock & Pothoff, Michael & Sousa, Ana I. & Flindt, Mogens R., 2018. "Agent Based Modelling (ABM) of eelgrass (Zostera marina) seedbank dynamics in a shallow Danish estuary," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 60-75.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Eelgrass; Recovery; GIS-analysis;
      All these keywords.

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:338:y:2016:i:c:p:122-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.