IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v327y2016icp85-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical impacts of habitat loss and generalist predation on predator–prey cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Vitense, Kelsey
  • Wirsing, Aaron J.
  • Tyson, Rebecca C.
  • Anderson, James J.

Abstract

Certain herbivores and their predators undergo high amplitude periodic fluctuations in abundance in northern latitudes but exhibit damped cyclic dynamics in their respective southern ranges. Generalist predators and habitat disturbance have been identified as two features of southern habitats that may contribute to the attenuation of cycles in southern latitudes. Using the snowshoe hare and Canada lynx as model species, we employed a reaction–diffusion–advection framework with reaction terms taken from the May and Rosenzweig–MacArthur models to study the relative and joint damping impacts of generalist predation and habitat loss on predator–prey cycles. We found that generalist predation has consistently strong stabilizing effects and may represent a threat to the persistence of specialized predators. Habitat loss also ultimately results in the loss of cycles, but cycle amplitude and animal densities may not always decrease monotonically with habitat loss. The joint damping impacts of generalists and habitat loss can be severe, consistent with observations of low cycle amplitude, high predation rates, and significant habitat loss in the southern ranges of cyclic species. Elevated generalist predation rates at patch edges and in the surrounding matrix hasten cycle attenuation in situations that lead to increased prey exposure to generalists, including small patch sizes, higher movement rates into the matrix, and increased prey density at patch edges. The dominant driver of cycle attenuation, as well as cycle response to habitat disturbance, may vary between regions and systems. Field data that help clarify the relationships between habitat loss and fragmentation, generalist density and behavior, and cyclic activity would be invaluable in informing future modeling and conservation efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitense, Kelsey & Wirsing, Aaron J. & Tyson, Rebecca C. & Anderson, James J., 2016. "Theoretical impacts of habitat loss and generalist predation on predator–prey cycles," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 327(C), pages 85-94.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:327:y:2016:i:c:p:85-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016300114
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vergara, Pablo M. & Hahn, Ingo, 2009. "Linking edge effects and patch size effects: Importance of matrix nest predators," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(9), pages 1189-1196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anjos, Lucas dos & Costa, Michel Iskin da S. & Almeida, Regina C., 2020. "Characterizing the existence of hydra effect in spatial predator-prey models and the influence of functional response types and species dispersal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferrarini, Alessandro & Tomaselli, Marcello, 2010. "A new approach to the analysis of adjacencies: Potentials for landscape insights," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1889-1896.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:327:y:2016:i:c:p:85-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.