IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v301y2015icp27-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the impact of fire on a vulnerable multi-species community using a dynamic vegetation model

Author

Listed:
  • Conlisk, Erin
  • Syphard, Alexandra D.
  • Franklin, Janet
  • Regan, Helen M.

Abstract

Conservation management under human-induced changes to disturbance requires tools that can balance the needs of multiple species with different life histories and habitat requirements. Despite this urgent conservation need, landscape management typically focuses on single species and rarely includes the influence of disturbance-dependent vegetation transitions on multiple target species. In this paper, we describe a simulation model that achieves these goals, ranking possible fire management strategies from the viewpoint of protecting endangered coastal Southern Californian wildlife. The model involves the direct and indirect effects of fire on four animal species of conservation concern (coastal cactus wren, California gnatcatcher, Stephens’ kangaroo rat, and Pacific pocket mouse) and five vegetation types (grass, coastal sage scrub, obligate seeding and resprouting chaparral, resprouting-only chaparral, and woodlands). Using historical fire records for the region, we predicted spatially-explicit fire frequencies and ignition probabilities. For these predictions, we simulated the location and extent of fires. Combining fire history and vegetation transition data from 1933 to 2003, we specified vegetation change probabilities under simulated fire regimes. Fire occurrence in a location altered habitat suitability, directly for each of the animal species and indirectly by changing the vegetative community. For some open-habitat species, such as the Stephens’ kangaroo rat and Pacific pocket mouse, fairly frequent fire is required to reduce the density of invasive grasses and herbs. For other species, such as the coastal cactus wren and California gnatcatcher, frequent fire destroys the mature coastal sage scrub on which these species depend. The model includes a management component, allowing us to rank fire management actions. Over a 50-year time horizon, we find that populations of California gnatcatchers and Pacific pocket mouse are highly variable, and the pocket mouse is particularly prone to decline, despite prescribed burns designed to boost population viability. California gnatcatchers were also likely to be extirpated in the model, with relatively small extirpation risks for the cactus wren and Stephens’ kangaroo rat. Despite conflicting requirements with respect to fire and differing life history traits among the four animals, we identified a beneficial strategy for our four target species, namely, controlling fire in coastal sage scrub.

Suggested Citation

  • Conlisk, Erin & Syphard, Alexandra D. & Franklin, Janet & Regan, Helen M., 2015. "Predicting the impact of fire on a vulnerable multi-species community using a dynamic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 27-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:301:y:2015:i:c:p:27-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015000605
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scheller, Robert M. & Domingo, James B. & Sturtevant, Brian R. & Williams, Jeremy S. & Rudy, Arnold & Gustafson, Eric J. & Mladenoff, David J., 2007. "Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 409-419.
    2. Norman Myers & Russell A. Mittermeier & Cristina G. Mittermeier & Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca & Jennifer Kent, 2000. "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 853-858, February.
    3. Sturtevant, Brian R. & Scheller, Robert M. & Miranda, Brian R. & Shinneman, Douglas & Syphard, Alexandra, 2009. "Simulating dynamic and mixed-severity fire regimes: A process-based fire extension for LANDIS-II," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3380-3393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jafarov, Elchin E. & Loudermilk, Louise E. & Hiers, Kevin J. & Williams, Brett & Linn, Rodman & Jones, Chas & Hill, Samantha C. & Atchley, Adam L., 2021. "Linking habitat suitability with a longleaf pine-hardwood model: Building a species-predictive fire-land management framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    2. Ager, Alan A. & Barros, Ana M.G. & Day, Michelle A. & Preisler, Haiganoush K. & Spies, Thomas A. & Bolte, John, 2018. "Analyzing fine-scale spatiotemporal drivers of wildfire in a forest landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 87-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scheller, Robert & Kretchun, Alec & Hawbaker, Todd J. & Henne, Paul D., 2019. "A landscape model of variable social-ecological fire regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 85-93.
    2. Lucash, Melissa S. & Marshall, Adrienne M. & Weiss, Shelby A. & McNabb, John W. & Nicolsky, Dmitry J. & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Link, Timothy E. & Vogel, Jason G. & Scheller, Robert M. & Abramoff, Ro, 2023. "Burning trees in frozen soil: Simulating fire, vegetation, soil, and hydrology in the boreal forests of Alaska," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    3. Cantarello, Elena & Newton, Adrian C. & Hill, Ross A. & Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia & Williams-Linera, Guadalupe & López-Barrera, Fabiola & Manson, Robert H. & Golicher, Duncan J., 2011. "Simulating the potential for ecological restoration of dryland forests in Mexico under different disturbance regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1112-1128.
    4. Inglis, Nicole C. & Vukomanovic, Jelena, 2020. "Climate change disproportionately affects visual quality of cultural ecosystem services in a mountain region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    5. de Bruijn, Arjan & Gustafson, Eric J. & Sturtevant, Brian R. & Foster, Jane R. & Miranda, Brian R. & Lichti, Nathanael I. & Jacobs, Douglass F., 2014. "Toward more robust projections of forest landscape dynamics under novel environmental conditions: Embedding PnET within LANDIS-II," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 287(C), pages 44-57.
    6. Simons-Legaard, Erin & Legaard, Kasey & Weiskittel, Aaron, 2015. "Predicting aboveground biomass with LANDIS-II: A global and temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 325-332.
    7. Cécile C. Remy & Alisa R. Keyser & Dan J. Krofcheck & Marcy E. Litvak & Matthew D. Hurteau, 2021. "Future fire-driven landscape changes along a southwestern US elevation gradient," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Laxmi D. Bhatta & Sunita Chaudhary & Anju Pandit & Himlal Baral & Partha J. Das & Nigel E. Stork, 2016. "Ecosystem Service Changes and Livelihood Impacts in the Maguri-Motapung Wetlands of Assam, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    9. McLennan, D. & Sharma, R., 2012. "The Delivering Ecological Services Index (DESI)," Working papers 119, Rimisp Latin American Center for Rural Development.
    10. Caviedes, Julián & Ibarra, José Tomás & Calvet-Mir, Laura & Álvarez-Fernández, Santiago & Junqueira, André Braga, 2024. "Indigenous and local knowledge on social-ecological changes is positively associated with livelihood resilience in a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Maeda, Eduardo Eiji & Clark, Barnaby J.F. & Pellikka, Petri & Siljander, Mika, 2010. "Modelling agricultural expansion in Kenya's Eastern Arc Mountains biodiversity hotspot," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(9), pages 609-620, November.
    12. Jaiswal, Sreeja & Balietti, Anca & Schäffer, Daniel, 2023. "Environmental Protection and Labor Market Composition," Working Papers 0736, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    13. Chomitz, Kenneth M. & Thomas, Timothy S. & Brandão, Antônio Salazar P., 2005. "The economic and environmental impact of trade in forest reserve obligations: a simulation analysis of options for dealing with habitat heterogeneity," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 43(4), January.
    14. Elisa Barbour & Lara Kueppers, 2012. "Conservation and management of ecological systems in a changing California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 135-163, March.
    15. Tyler M Harms & Kevin T Murphy & Xiaodan Lyu & Shane S Patterson & Karen E Kinkead & Stephen J Dinsmore & Paul W Frese, 2017. "Using landscape habitat associations to prioritize areas of conservation action for terrestrial birds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    16. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Brannstrom, Christian, 2001. "Conservation-with-Development Models in Brazil's Agro-Pastoral Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1345-1359, August.
    18. Brendan Fisher & Stephen Polasky & Thomas Sterner, 2011. "Conservation and Human Welfare: Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 151-159, February.
    19. Pütz, S. & Groeneveld, J. & Alves, L.F. & Metzger, J.P. & Huth, A., 2011. "Fragmentation drives tropical forest fragments to early successional states: A modelling study for Brazilian Atlantic forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 1986-1997.
    20. Paige, Sarah B. & Malavé, Carly & Mbabazi, Edith & Mayer, Jonathan & Goldberg, Tony L., 2015. "Uncovering zoonoses awareness in an emerging disease ‘hotspot’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 78-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:301:y:2015:i:c:p:27-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.