IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v298y2015icp39-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complex controls of denitrification at ecosystem, landscape and regional scales in northern hardwood forests

Author

Listed:
  • Kulkarni, Madhura V.
  • Groffman, Peter M.
  • Yavitt, Joseph B.
  • Goodale, Christine L.

Abstract

Denitrification is the most poorly constrained term in the nitrogen (N) budgets of northern hardwood forests due to extraordinary complexity in soil, hydrology and ecosystem processes. This anaerobic microbial process is controlled by the availability of oxygen (O2), nitrate (NO3−) and available carbon (C) and produces three end products; nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O) and dinitrogen (N2). Expression of these controlling factors is regulated by ecosystem, landscape and regional factors that influence soil moisture and N and C fluxes that interact to create complexity and extreme variability in flux rates. We investigated these controls and the capacity of topographic index (TI) and foliar N (FN), indicators of moisture and N richness, respectively, to function as integrated predictors of N2 and N2O fluxes at ecosystem, landscape and regional scales at three sites in New Hampshire, USA, including the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) long-term ecological research site. We found high N2 fluxes, low N2O fluxes, and high N2:N2O ratios at all sites, with best estimates of ∼3–4kgNha−1growing season−1 for N2 and ∼0.005–0.05kgNha−1growing season−1, for N2O fluxes. N flux rates exhibited considerable spatial variability both within and among sites, as well as temporal variability within a season and among seasons. Indicators of N richness (e.g., net nitrification, C:N ratio, and soil ammonium (NH4+) concentrations) were the strongest predictors of N gas fluxes at the ecosystem scale suggesting that these fluxes are controlled by N limitation in this region. Regressions between fluxes and TI and FN were used to create maps of seasonal N flux for the HBEF landscape for 2005 and 2006. At the regional scale, there were marked and coherent patterns between site history, N cycling variables and N gas fluxes. Variation in the relationship between FN and N gas fluxes between years suggests that while the proximal, organismal-scale controls of these fluxes do not vary, the distal factors that influence the proximal controls show marked temporal and spatial variation. Higher resolution and/or more dynamic data may be necessary to improve the accuracy of landscape and regional scale assessments of these fluxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kulkarni, Madhura V. & Groffman, Peter M. & Yavitt, Joseph B. & Goodale, Christine L., 2015. "Complex controls of denitrification at ecosystem, landscape and regional scales in northern hardwood forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 298(C), pages 39-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:298:y:2015:i:c:p:39-52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014001549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulo Henrique Santos Gonçalves & Thiago Gonçalves-Souza & Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, 2020. "Chronic anthropogenic disturbances in ecology: a bibliometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 1103-1117, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:298:y:2015:i:c:p:39-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.