IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v292y2014icp26-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variance-based sensitivity analysis of BIOME-BGC for gross and net primary production

Author

Listed:
  • Raj, R.
  • Hamm, N.A.S.
  • van der Tol, C.
  • Stein, A.

Abstract

Parameterization and calibration of a process-based simulator (PBS) is a major challenge when simulating gross and net primary production (GPP and NPP). The large number of parameters makes the calibration computationally expensive and is complicated by the dependence of several parameters on other parameters. Calibration can be simplified by first identifying those parameters for which GPP and NPP are most sensitive. For an appropriate application of a PBS, a sensitivity analysis is an essential step. Sensitivity analysis based on local derivatives (i.e., one-at-a-time analysis) does not examine the PBS behaviour over the whole parameter space. This study therefore implements a variance-based sensitivity analysis (VBSA) addressing the full range of PBS input. A VBSA is also independent of non-linearity in a PBS. This paper performs a VBSA of the process-based simulator BIOME-BGC for GPP and NPP output in a Douglas-fir stand at the Speulderbos forest site, The Netherlands. The results show that GPP and NPP are highly sensitive to the following parameters: fraction of leaf nitrogen in Rubisco, the ratio of fine root carbon to leaf carbon, the ratio of carbon to nitrogen in leaf and fine root, the leaf and fine root turnover, the water interception coefficient and soil depth. GPP and NPP are particularly sensitive to the ratio of fine root carbon to leaf carbon that is responsible for leaf area index development. The study concludes that a VBSA analysis provides a reliable and useful approach for a sensitivity analysis of process-based simulators with a complicated structure in the parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Raj, R. & Hamm, N.A.S. & van der Tol, C. & Stein, A., 2014. "Variance-based sensitivity analysis of BIOME-BGC for gross and net primary production," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 26-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:292:y:2014:i:c:p:26-36
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014003913
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Srinet, Ritika & Nandy, Subrata & Patel, N.R. & Padalia, Hitendra & Watham, Taibanganba & Singh, Sanjeev K. & Chauhan, Prakash, 2023. "Simulation of forest carbon fluxes by integrating remote sensing data into biome-BGC model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    2. Junyi Liu & Zhixiang Wu & Siqi Yang & Chuan Yang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Biome-BGC for Gross Primary Production of a Rubber Plantation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Nicholas A S Hamm & Ricardo J Soares Magalhães & Archie C A Clements, 2015. "Earth Observation, Spatial Data Quality, and Neglected Tropical Diseases," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:292:y:2014:i:c:p:26-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.