IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v240y2012icp93-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approximate Bayesian algorithm for training fuzzy cognitive map models of forest responses to deer control in a New Zealand adaptive management experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Ramsey, David S.L.
  • Forsyth, David M.
  • Veltman, Clare J.
  • Nicol, Simon J.
  • Todd, Charles R.
  • Allen, Robert B.
  • Allen, Will J.
  • Bellingham, Peter J.
  • Richardson, Sarah J.
  • Jacobson, Chris L.
  • Barker, Richard J.

Abstract

Forest management decisions are characterised by a high level of uncertainty because responses reflect a range of interacting ecological processes. Faced with this situation, modelling can be a useful tool for characterising that uncertainty and for predicting its impacts on management decisions. In the adaptive management paradigm, different model structures are essentially hypotheses of system behaviour that are formulated to encapsulate structural uncertainty about the system. Here we report upon the initial stages of a management-scale experiment designed to increase our understanding of the effects of deer control on forest ecosystems in New Zealand. Using a modelling approach based on fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) we were able to formalise expert knowledge and explore how growth rates of tree seedlings would respond to lower deer densities, with or without responses by other plants in the forest understorey. Alternative models predicted that the response of seedling growth and biomass in small (16m2) plots used in the experiment were dependent on hypotheses about the strength of plant competition for soil nutrients and moisture which, in turn, were conditional on light availability in the plot. To learn about which model best may describe the system, we used recently proposed methods in Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) to perform model selection and inference using a simulated data set generated from one of our candidate models. Using a novel Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm together with ABC model selection on our simulated data we show that these procedures provide reliable model selection and parameter inference and hence, should be suitable for confronting our candidate FCM models with data collected at the end of the experiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramsey, David S.L. & Forsyth, David M. & Veltman, Clare J. & Nicol, Simon J. & Todd, Charles R. & Allen, Robert B. & Allen, Will J. & Bellingham, Peter J. & Richardson, Sarah J. & Jacobson, Chris L. &, 2012. "An approximate Bayesian algorithm for training fuzzy cognitive map models of forest responses to deer control in a New Zealand adaptive management experiment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 93-104.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:240:y:2012:i:c:p:93-104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.04.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012001950
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.04.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MontaƱo-Moctezuma, Gabriela & Li, Hiram W. & Rossignol, Philippe A., 2007. "Alternative community structures in a kelp-urchin community: A qualitative modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 343-354.
    2. David A. Wardle & Olle Zackrisson, 2005. "Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7043), pages 806-810, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rustici, M. & Ceccherelli, G. & Piazzi, L., 2017. "Predator exploitation and sea urchin bistability: Consequence on benthic alternative states," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 344(C), pages 1-5.
    2. Costanza, Robert & Fisher, Brendan & Mulder, Kenneth & Liu, Shuang & Christopher, Treg, 2007. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 478-491, March.
    3. Xinli Chen & Peter B. Reich & Anthony R. Taylor & Zhengfeng An & Scott X. Chang, 2024. "Resource availability enhances positive tree functional diversity effects on carbon and nitrogen accrual in natural forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:240:y:2012:i:c:p:93-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.