IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v235-236y2012ip59-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conditional choice model of habitat selection explains the source-sink paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Loehle, C.

Abstract

The ideal free distribution posits that at equilibrium habitats of all degrees of quality should have similar population growth rate (λ) values (≈1), but in fact sink habitats are often observed with λ<1 when source habitats have λ>1. This is the source-sink paradox. Animals appear to be choosing habitat that will lower their fitness. It is argued that the paradox can be resolved by considering individual decisions in a conditional choice model with non-identical individuals that differ in competitive ability and current expected reproductive output. Individuals that are more mature, healthier, and/or arrive earlier to the source will acquire territory at lower cost and will defend it more vigorously and effectively. For other individuals, costs (including running out of time for breeding) of acquiring territory in the source become so high that moving to the sink increases their fitness. The model is implemented in an individual-based modeling framework. The cost–benefit decision model unites previously disparate topics into a single framework, including protandry, territoriality, philopatry, and juvenile dispersal. Simulation results and a literature survey support predictions. Results indicate that individuals with lower competitive ability (e.g., juveniles) obtain a fitness advantage from moving to a sink. Random sorting of individuals (simple pre-emption) results in lower population λ than competitive sorting. The effective population λ in the source is increased and in the sink is decreased by competitive sorting such that individual and population λ are not simple functions of habitat quality. The theory and models developed link individual behaviours to population processes and resolve the source-sink paradox. It is suggested that metapopulation modeling theory needs to be revisited based on the results presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Loehle, C., 2012. "A conditional choice model of habitat selection explains the source-sink paradox," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 235, pages 59-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:235-236:y:2012:i::p:59-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012001640
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. P. Møller & J. T. Nielsen & L. Z. Garamszegi, 2006. "Song post exposure, song features, and predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 155-163, March.
    2. Jennifer A. Gill & Ken Norris & Peter M. Potts & Tómas Grétar Gunnarsson & Philip W. Atkinson & William J. Sutherland, 2001. "The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6845), pages 436-438, July.
    3. A.P. Møller & J.T. Nielsen & L.Z. Garamzegi, 2008. "Risk taking by singing males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 41-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sánchez-Clavijo, Lina M. & Hearns, Jessica & Quintana-Ascencio, Pedro F., 2016. "Modeling the effect of habitat selection mechanisms on population responses to landscape structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 99-107.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp Sprau & Tobias Roth & Marc Naguib & Valentin Amrhein, 2012. "Communication in the Third Dimension: Song Perch Height of Rivals Affects Singing Response in Nightingales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-6, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:235-236:y:2012:i::p:59-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.