IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i8p1448-1455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting local population distributions around a central shelter based on a predation risk-growth trade-off

Author

Listed:
  • Biesinger, Zy
  • Bolker, Benjamin M.
  • Lindberg, William J.

Abstract

Animals face trade-offs between predation risk and foraging success depending on their location in the landscape; for example, individuals that remain near a common shelter may be safe from predation but incur stronger competition for resources. Despite a long tradition of theoretical exploration of the relationships among foraging success, conspecific competition, predation risk, and population distribution in a heterogeneous environment, the scenario we describe here has not been explored theoretically. We construct a model of habitat use rules to predict the distribution of a local population (prey sharing a common shelter and foraging across surrounding habitats). Our model describes realized habitat quality as a ratio of density- and location-dependent mortality to density-dependent growth. We explore how the prey distribution around a shelter is expected to change as the parameters governing the strength of density dependence, landscape characteristics, and local abundance vary. Within the range of parameters where prey spend some time away from shelter but remain site-attached, the prey density decreases away from shelter. As the distance at which prey react to predators increases, the population range generally increases. At intermediate reaction distances, however, increases in the reaction distance lead to decreases in the maximum foraging distance because of increased evenness in the population distribution. As total abundance increases, the population range increases, average population density increases, and realized quality decreases. The magnitude of these changes differs in, for example, ‘high-’ and ‘low-visibility’ landscapes where prey can detect predators at different distances.

Suggested Citation

  • Biesinger, Zy & Bolker, Benjamin M. & Lindberg, William J., 2011. "Predicting local population distributions around a central shelter based on a predation risk-growth trade-off," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1448-1455.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:8:p:1448-1455
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011000767
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Broom & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2005. "You can run--or you can hide: optimal strategies for cryptic prey against pursuit predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 534-540, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dana M. Williams & Diogo S.M. Samia & William E. Cooper & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2014. "The flush early and avoid the rush hypothesis holds after accounting for spontaneous behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1136-1147.
    2. Tore Slagsvold & Jan Hušek & Jason D. Whittington & Karen L. Wiebe, 2014. "Antipredator behavior: escape flights on a landscape slope," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 378-385.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:8:p:1448-1455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.