IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v221y2010i22p2642-2655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of low and decreasing food levels on Daphnia-algal interactions: Numerical experiments with a new dynamic energy budget model

Author

Listed:
  • Peeters, F.
  • Li, J.
  • Straile, D.
  • Rothhaupt, K.-O.
  • Vijverberg, J.

Abstract

Based on numerical experiments with a new physiologically structured population model we demonstrate that predator physiology under low food and under starving conditions can have substantial implications for population dynamics in predator–prey interactions. We focused on Daphnia-algae interactions as model system and developed a new dynamic energy budget (DEB) model for individual daphnids. This model integrates the κ-rule approach common to net assimilation models into a net-production model, but uses a fixed allocation of net-productive energy in juveniles. The new DEB-model agrees well with the results of life history experiments with Daphnia. Compared to a pure κ-rule model the new allocation scheme leads to significant earlier maturation at low food levels and thus is in better agreement with the data. Incorporation of the new DEB-model into a physiologically structured population model using a box-car elevator technique revealed that the dynamics of Daphnia-algae interactions are highly sensitive to the assumptions on the energy allocation of juveniles under low food conditions. Additionally we show that also other energy allocation rules of our DEB-model concerning decreasing food levels and starving conditions at the individual level have strong implications for Daphnia-algae interactions at the population level. With increasing carrying capacity of algae a stable equilibrium with coexistence of Daphnia occurs and algae shifts to limit cycles. The amplitudes of the limit cycles increase with increasing percentage of sustainable weight loss. If a κ-rule energy allocation is applied to juveniles, the stable equilibrium occurs for a much narrower range of algal carrying capacities, the algal concentration at equilibrium is about 2 times larger, and the range of algae carrying capacities at which daphnids become extinct extends to higher carrying capacities than in the new DEB-model. Because predator–prey dynamics are very sensitive to predator physiology under low food and starving conditions, empirical constraints of predator physiology under these conditions are essential when comparing model results with observations in laboratory experiments or in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Peeters, F. & Li, J. & Straile, D. & Rothhaupt, K.-O. & Vijverberg, J., 2010. "Influence of low and decreasing food levels on Daphnia-algal interactions: Numerical experiments with a new dynamic energy budget model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(22), pages 2642-2655.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:22:p:2642-2655
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010004011
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanoverbeke, Joost, 2008. "Modeling individual and population dynamics in a consumer–resource system: Behavior under food limitation and crowding and the effect on population cycling in Daphnia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 385-401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaumot, Charlène & Saucède, Thomas & Morley, Simon A. & Augustine, Starrlight & Danis, Bruno & Kooijman, Sebastiaan, 2020. "Can DEB models infer metabolic differences between intertidal and subtidal morphotypes of the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna (Strebel, 1908)?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    2. Kupisch, Moritz & Moenickes, Sylvia & Schlief, Jeanette & Frassl, Marieke & Richter, Otto, 2012. "Temperature-dependent consumer-resource dynamics: A coupled structured model for Gammarus pulex (L.) and leaf litter," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 157-167.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grasman, Johan & van Nes, Egbert H. & Kersting, Kees, 2009. "Data-directed modelling of Daphnia dynamics in a long-term micro-ecosystem experiment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 343-350.
    2. Lamonica, Dominique & Herbach, Ulysse & Orias, Frédéric & Clément, Bernard & Charles, Sandrine & Lopes, Christelle, 2016. "Mechanistic modelling of daphnid-algae dynamics within a laboratory microcosm," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 213-230.
    3. Radchuk, Viktoriia & Oppel, Steffen & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Grimm, Volker & Schtickzelle, Nicolas, 2016. "Simple or complex: Relative impact of data availability and model purpose on the choice of model types for population viability analyses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 87-95.
    4. Kupisch, Moritz & Moenickes, Sylvia & Schlief, Jeanette & Frassl, Marieke & Richter, Otto, 2012. "Temperature-dependent consumer-resource dynamics: A coupled structured model for Gammarus pulex (L.) and leaf litter," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 157-167.
    5. Preuss, Thomas Günter & Hammers-Wirtz, Monika & Hommen, Udo & Rubach, Mascha Nadine & Ratte, Hans Toni, 2009. "Development and validation of an individual based Daphnia magna population model: The influence of crowding on population dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 310-329.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:22:p:2642-2655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.