IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i13p1566-1577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy vs information in ecological successions: Interpreting community changes by a classical thermodynamic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ludovisi, A.

Abstract

This work proposes a methodology based on classical thermodynamics, which allows the variation in ecosystem composition to be interpreted within the framework of the exergy concept. The basic equation of exergy [Mejer, H., Jorgensen, S.E., 1979. Exergy and ecological buffer capacity. State-of-the-art in Ecological Modelling 7, 829–846] was decomposed into three terms –size (C), structural information (I) and concentration (X) – and their significance as indicators of ecosystem state was evaluated by simulating different scenarios of development in a simplified freshwater ecosystem. In order to calculate the exergy terms, the most critical issue in using exergy in an ecological context, i.e. the estimate of reference equilibrium values for organic matter and organisms, had to be faced. With this aim, the equations of classical thermodynamics in solution were applied, and “virtual” values of concentration at equilibrium were calculated for a number of organic compounds (VEC) and freshwater organisms (VECE). The results of the simulation showed that, whereas exergy and the exergy terms inherently connected with the a-biotic component varied consistently with the incorporation of biomass into the ecosystem, the structural information of the biotic component followed different, even opposite, pathways of variation, which were dependent only on the change in the size spectrum of the community. Due to the strict dependence of the VECE values on organism size, the increase of structural information with increasing abundance of large and complex species is also consistent with the general pattern of succession delineated by the classical r–K model. Structural information is therefore proposed as an indicator of the development state, as well as an ecological orientor, whose maximisation is expected during ecosystem development. However, since an increase in structural information is not necessarily accompanied by an increase in exergy, a sort of “antagonism” between these two related orientors emerges, whose resolution may contribute to shed light on the fundamental forces which drive ecosystem development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludovisi, A., 2009. "Exergy vs information in ecological successions: Interpreting community changes by a classical thermodynamic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(13), pages 1566-1577.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:13:p:1566-1577
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009002580
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jørgensen, Sven Erik & Ludovisi, Alessandro & Nielsen, Søren Nors, 2010. "The free energy and information embodied in the amino acid chains of organisms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2388-2392.
    2. Ludovisi, Alessandro & Roselli, Leonilde & Basset, Alberto, 2012. "Testing the effectiveness of exergy-based tools on a seasonal succession in a coastal lagoon by using a size distribution approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 125-135.
    3. Ludovisi, Alessandro & Jørgensen, Sven Erik, 2009. "Comparison of exergy found by a classical thermodynamic approach and by the use of the information stored in the genome," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(16), pages 1897-1903.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:13:p:1566-1577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.