IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v218y2008i3p247-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a dynamic stem diameter variation model and the resulting seasonal changes in calibrated parameter values

Author

Listed:
  • Steppe, Kathy
  • De Pauw, Dirk J.W.
  • Lemeur, Raoul

Abstract

Validation of ecological models is not a straightforward task and much controversy exists in the published literature on the exact definition. A lot of approaches have been suggested, without one being clearly superior. In this paper, we use the earlier published dynamic ‘RCGro’ tree water flow and storage model as an illustrative example to address some model validation issues. We show that the model fails validation when confronted with a data set not used during model building and calibration. We apply and discuss therefore several validation criteria, including visual comparison between model output and measured data using both time series and scatter plots, calculation of the slope, the intercept and the R2 statistic of the regression line, computation of the model efficiency, and visual analysis of the residual errors. We then investigate Rykiel's [Rykiel Jr., E.J., 1996. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol. Model. 90, 229–244] suggestion to re-calibrate the model in order to deal with validation failures. Using three different data sets representing spring, summer and late summer growth of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and oak (Quercus robur L.), we show that model re-calibration is necessary to successfully pass both the visual and the quantitative validation tests. Recalibration caused the values of some of the hydraulic parameters to change (C(stem) and C(crown)) as well as parameters related to radial stem growth (β and ϕ). From these changes, information regarding the overall seasonal behaviour could be derived (e.g., cessation of growth). Additionally, it was shown that general conclusions about the differences between beech and oak (e.g., a higher hydraulic capacitance and a lower hydraulic xylem resistance for oak compared to beech) remained valid across the seasons as well. We finally demonstrate that the recalibrated model parameter values are not transferable across the growing season and underscore the need for caution when applying a model or application developed for one temporal or spatial situation to another.

Suggested Citation

  • Steppe, Kathy & De Pauw, Dirk J.W. & Lemeur, Raoul, 2008. "Validation of a dynamic stem diameter variation model and the resulting seasonal changes in calibrated parameter values," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 247-259.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:218:y:2008:i:3:p:247-259
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008003475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo, 2006. "Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 225-247, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Percy, A. Jemila & Edwin, M., 2023. "Studies on the performance and emission characteristics of a dual fuel VCR engine using producer gas as secondary fuel: An optimization approach using response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    2. Amin, M.G. Mostofa & Šimůnek, Jirka & Lægdsmand, Mette, 2014. "Simulation of the redistribution and fate of contaminants from soil-injected animal slurry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 17-29.
    3. Confalonieri, Roberto & Acutis, Marco & Bellocchi, Gianni & Donatelli, Marcello, 2009. "Multi-metric evaluation of the models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1395-1410.
    4. María Gabriela Pizarro Inostroza & Francisco Javier Navas González & Vincenzo Landi & José Manuel León Jurado & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo & Javier Fernández Álvarez & María del Amparo Martínez Mart, 2020. "Software-Automatized Individual Lactation Model Fitting, Peak and Persistence and Bayesian Criteria Comparison for Milk Yield Genetic Studies in Murciano-Granadina Goats," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Kuo Jiang & Hong Zeng & Zefan Wu & Jianping Sun & Cai Chen & Bing Han, 2023. "Study on the Effect of Parameter Sensitivity on Engine Optimization Results," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Stirling, Sofía & Fariña, Santiago & Pacheco, David & Vibart, Ronaldo, 2021. "Whole-farm modelling of grazing dairy systems in Uruguay," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Phelan, David C. & Harrison, Matthew T. & McLean, Greg & Cox, Howard & Pembleton, Kieth G. & Dean, Geoff J. & Parsons, David & do Amaral Richter, Maria E. & Pengilley, Georgie & Hinton, Sue J. & Moham, 2018. "Advancing a farmer decision support tool for agronomic decisions on rainfed and irrigated wheat cropping in Tasmania," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 113-124.
    8. Bryant, Jeremy & Lopez-Villalobos, Nicolas & Holmes, Colin & Pryce, Jennie & Rossi, Jose & Macdonald, Kevin, 2008. "Development and evaluation of a pastoral simulation model that predicts dairy cattle performance based on animal genotype and environmental sensitivity information," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 97(1-2), pages 13-25, April.
    9. Ojeda, Jonathan J. & Volenec, Jeffrey J. & Brouder, Sylvie M. & Caviglia, Octavio P. & Agnusdei, Mónica G., 2018. "Modelling stover and grain yields, and subsurface artificial drainage from long-term corn rotations using APSIM," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 154-171.
    10. Correndo, Adrian A. & Hefley, Trevor J. & Holzworth, Dean P. & Ciampitti, Ignacio A., 2021. "Revisiting linear regression to test agreement in continuous predicted-observed datasets," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    12. Benjamin L. Turner & Vincent Tidwell & Alexander Fernald & José A. Rivera & Sylvia Rodriguez & Steven Guldan & Carlos Ochoa & Brian Hurd & Kenneth Boykin & Andres Cibils, 2016. "Modeling Acequia Irrigation Systems Using System Dynamics: Model Development, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Analyses to Investigate Effects of Socio-Economic and Biophysical Feedbacks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-30, October.
    13. Lynch, R. & Kelly, A.K. & Kenny, D.A. & Crosson, P., 2020. "Development and evaluation of a dynamic simulation model of reproductive performance in pasture based suckler beef systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Yury B. Melnikov & Yelena A. Onokhina & Sergey A. Shitikov, 2018. "Improving the Adequacy of Economic Models," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 94-106, February.
    15. Ségolène Maucourt & Frédéric Fortin & Claude Robert & Pierre Giovenazzo, 2021. "Genetic Progress Achieved during 10 Years of Selective Breeding for Honeybee Traits of Interest to the Beekeeping Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Mateus P Gionbelli & Marcio S Duarte & Sebastião C Valadares Filho & Edenio Detmann & Mario L Chizzotti & Felipe C Rodrigues & Diego Zanetti & Tathyane R S Gionbelli & Marcelo G Machado, 2015. "Achieving Body Weight Adjustments for Feeding Status and Pregnant or Non-Pregnant Condition in Beef Cows," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel & Geraldo Tadeu dos Santos & Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo & Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Ítavo & Gelson dos Santos Difante & Alexandre Menezes Dias & Vanessa Zirondi Longh, 2023. "Mathematical Models to Predict Dry Matter Intake and Milk Production by Dairy Cows Managed under Tropical Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, July.
    18. repec:url:i20181:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:94-106 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Mollier, Alain & De Willigen, Peter & Heinen, Marius & Morel, Christian & Schneider, André & Pellerin, Sylvain, 2008. "A two-dimensional simulation model of phosphorus uptake including crop growth and P-response," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 453-464.
    20. Turner, B.L. & Rhoades, R.D. & Tedeschi, L.O. & Hanagriff, R.D. & McCuistion, K.C. & Dunn, B.H., 2013. "Analyzing ranch profitability from varying cow sales and heifer replacement rates for beef cow-calf production using system dynamics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 6-14.
    21. Ojeda, J.J. & Pembleton, K.G. & Islam, M.R. & Agnusdei, M.G. & Garcia, S.C., 2016. "Evaluation of the agricultural production systems simulator simulating Lucerne and annual ryegrass dry matter yield in the Argentine Pampas and south-eastern Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 61-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:218:y:2008:i:3:p:247-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.