IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v213y2008i3p273-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instantaneous intake rate of herbivores as function of forage quality and mass: Effects on facilitative and competitive interactions

Author

Listed:
  • van Langevelde, Frank
  • Drescher, Michael
  • Heitkönig, Ignas M.A.
  • Prins, Herbert H.T.

Abstract

The functional response as the link between the consumer and its resource is a central issue in herbivore–vegetation interactions. Vegetation often consists of low and high quality tissue due to nutritional or structural differences. It has been observed that the instantaneous intake rate of herbivores decreases with decreasing forage quality. However, so far variation in forage quality is not explicitly considered when modeling this instantaneous intake rate. In this paper, we derive a model for the instantaneous intake rate depending on forage quality, i.e., the proportion of high quality tissue in the vegetation. In the model, a downward deflection of the functional response curve is caused by a reduction of the maximum consumption rate at high proportions of low quality tissue. The model gives a mechanistic explanation for decreasing intake rate with decreasing forage quality. Compared to a conventional functional response model with constant maximum consumption rate, a herbivore–grass model with the forage quality-dependent functional response leads to discontinuous changes in the vegetation and herbivore density. The effects hinge on the positive feedback between herbivore density and the proportion of high quality forage. Our analyses show that this positive feedback can explain the maintenance of lawn grass where a high herbivore density can maintain high quality forage. The model results indicate that depending on the coefficients of trophic conversion from resource to consumer, co-existence, facilitation and competitive exclusion between differently sized herbivore species can emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • van Langevelde, Frank & Drescher, Michael & Heitkönig, Ignas M.A. & Prins, Herbert H.T., 2008. "Instantaneous intake rate of herbivores as function of forage quality and mass: Effects on facilitative and competitive interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 273-284.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:213:y:2008:i:3:p:273-284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.12.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380007006485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.12.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baveco, Johannes M. & Kuipers, Harold & Nolet, Bart A., 2011. "A large-scale multi-species spatial depletion model for overwintering waterfowl," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3773-3784.
    2. Xulin Guo & John F. Wilmshurst & Zhaoqin Li, 2010. "Comparison of Laboratory and Field Remote Sensing Methods to Measure Forage Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Mouissie, A. Maarten & Apol, M. Emile F. & Heil, Gerrit W. & van Diggelen, Rudy, 2008. "Creation and preservation of vegetation patterns by grazing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 60-72.
    4. Ranjan, Ravi & Bagchi, Sumanta, 2016. "Functional response and body size in consumer–resource interactions: Unimodality favors facilitation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 25-35.
    5. Kramer, K. & Prins, H.H.T., 2010. "Allometric scaling of resource acquisition by ruminants in dynamic and heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(21), pages 2555-2564.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:213:y:2008:i:3:p:273-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.