IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v230y2025ics0921800924004129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's current carbon inequality is predominantly determined by capital disparity

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Peipei
  • Ma, Haoyu
  • Zhang, Zeyi
  • Yu, Yang
  • Li, Dan

Abstract

The responsibility for carbon emissions is unequally distributed among socioeconomic groups due to consumption and wealth inequality. Examining carbon inequality is crucial for achieving fair and just climate mitigation. As the world largest carbon emitter, China has been the focus of numerous studies on carbon inequality. However, most of these studies have primarily concentrated on the inequality of household consumption-related emissions, overlooking the nation's largest carbon emission category: capital formation. In this study, we investigate national and provincial carbon inequality in China among income groups, involving three consumption-based emission categories: household consumption, government spending, and capital formation-related emissions. The results reveal that the top 20 % of urban residents, comprising 9.7 % of the population, are responsible for 33 % of the capital formation-related carbon emissions. In contrast, the lowest 20 % of rural residents, accounting for 8.6 % of the population, contribute only 2 % of such emissions. The carbon inequality associated with capital formation is significantly larger than that of household consumption in almost all provinces. Further decomposition analysis shows that carbon inequality in capital formation is the dominant contributors (more than 60 % in 24 out of 29 provinces) to China's overall carbon inequality. These findings suggest that reducing carbon emissions and addressing inequality should focus on the capital/investment of the high-income groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Peipei & Ma, Haoyu & Zhang, Zeyi & Yu, Yang & Li, Dan, 2025. "China's current carbon inequality is predominantly determined by capital disparity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:230:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924004129
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924004129
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:230:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924004129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.