IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v77y2025ics1062940825000282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate ESG disclosure and regulatory inquiry: Evidence from comment letters on annual reports

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xin
  • Tong, Yan
  • Xu, Guoquan

Abstract

Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2015 to 2021, this paper finds that corporate ESG disclosure reduces the likelihood of regulatory inquiries. Channel analysis demonstrates that corporate ESG disclosure lowers regulatory inquiry risk by reducing agency costs and business risks. This relationship is more pronounced in firms that have less disagreement in ESG ratings, have higher levels of digital transformation, operate in highly polluting industries, or are situated in more favorable institutional environments. Further analysis indicates that corporate ESG disclosure is associated with a lower probability of delayed responses by firms, the need for verification opinions from intermediary institutions by stock exchanges, and inquiries regarding risk information from stock exchanges. The study expands the literature on the determinants of regulatory inquiries. It also sheds light on corporations’ improvement of information disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xin & Tong, Yan & Xu, Guoquan, 2025. "Corporate ESG disclosure and regulatory inquiry: Evidence from comment letters on annual reports," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:77:y:2025:i:c:s1062940825000282
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2025.102388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000282
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2025.102388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:77:y:2025:i:c:s1062940825000282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.