IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v68y2023ics1062940823000852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which liquidity indicator is more informative to market volatility? Spectrum analysis of China’s base metal futures market

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Xiangyu
  • Tongurai, Jittima

Abstract

By applying the frequency domain causality test and cross-spectral coherence analysis, this study investigates the informational effects of liquidity indicators on the volatility of China’s base metal futures market from January 2016 to June 2022. We find that trading volume is more informative in economically explaining the price variations of most base metal futures for all frequency horizons, while open interest is more informative to Granger-cause economic innovations in the market volatility of the lead and nickel futures markets both in the short and long run. The coherence levels between the underlying frequency components for open interest are found to be greater than those for trading volume, suggesting that price volatility in China’s base metal futures market would be more responsive to shocks in open interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Xiangyu & Tongurai, Jittima, 2023. "Which liquidity indicator is more informative to market volatility? Spectrum analysis of China’s base metal futures market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:68:y:2023:i:c:s1062940823000852
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2023.101962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940823000852
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2023.101962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:68:y:2023:i:c:s1062940823000852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.