IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v144y2025ics0264999324003626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralized government and firm pollution discharges: Evidence from China’s Province-Managing-County reform

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang, Xunyong
  • Luo, Wenjie
  • Li, Bin
  • Liang, Wenquan

Abstract

This paper investigates the environmental impact of a decentralization policy, China’s Province-Managing-County (PMC) reform, aimed at stimulating local economic growth by granting counties greater fiscal authority. Leveraging firm-level panel data on pollution emissions, we employ a difference-in-differences method to examine how the PMC affects pollution emissions, providing micro-level evidence to the literature on fiscal policies and environmental outcomes. Our results indicate that the PMC reform leads to increases in water pollution by 36.8% and air pollution by 8.6%. The mechanisms behind these findings are linked to local governments’ incentives to boost tax revenues and economic growth, which drive increased firm output, tax payment, and expanded production capacity. We identify heterogeneity across counties and firms: counties with higher pre-reform fiscal revenue experience less pollution growth, while firms affiliated with county governments show greater increases in emissions. These results highlight the trade-offs between fiscal decentralization and environmental protection, suggesting that policies aimed at economic growth should also incorporate measures to evaluate environmental damages.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang, Xunyong & Luo, Wenjie & Li, Bin & Liang, Wenquan, 2025. "Decentralized government and firm pollution discharges: Evidence from China’s Province-Managing-County reform," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0264999324003626
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2024.107005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324003626
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.107005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0264999324003626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.