IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v85y2025icp336-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fertility policy, fertility intentions, and fertility transition: A quasi-natural experiment based on the "Universal Two-Child" Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Lei, Haidong
  • Ma, Jie
  • Chen, Xiaodong
  • Ding, Ziyue

Abstract

Fertility policies do not directly influence fertility behaviors but rather act through the mediation of fertility intentions. This study develops a framework for analyzing the transition of fertility intentions under the policy of relaxing fertility restrictions across different orders. It introduces a novel “intention-policy-behavior” linkage to elucidate the mechanisms of fertility transition. Using panel data from the 2014 and 2018 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we focus on group with one child and examining the effect of "Universal Two-Child" policy on transforming fertility intentions into behavior. It finds that families wanting two or more children significantly increased their number of children after the policy's implementation. Additionally, the greater the fertility intention, the better the transformative effect of the fertility policy. In group studies, the transformation of fertility intentions is significantly higher when the firstborn is a girl in urban areas, indicating a gender preference for male children in fertility decisions. Lastly, heterogeneity analysis reveals that housing wealth also impacts the transformation of intentions, with those desiring a third child requiring more living space. Our study confirms the role of fertility policies in transforming fertility intentions into behavior. A multidimensional policy combination with others aimed at boosting fertility intentions can effectively enhance fertility rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei, Haidong & Ma, Jie & Chen, Xiaodong & Ding, Ziyue, 2025. "Fertility policy, fertility intentions, and fertility transition: A quasi-natural experiment based on the "Universal Two-Child" Policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 336-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:336-352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.12.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262400345X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2024.12.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fertility Policy; Fertility Rate; Fertility Intentions; Fertility Transition; Two-Child Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:336-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.