IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v85y2025icp1442-1455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of public investment on agricultural productivity growth: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Siqi
  • Cai, Rong
  • Wang, Shujuan

Abstract

Based on a balanced panel dataset of 1924 counties in China from 2000 to 2021, we first evaluated the agricultural productivity using a four-component stochastic frontier model, and then employed a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) analytical framework to assess the impact of the Hundred Billion Program (HBP), a large-scale public investment in agriculture, on the growth of China's agricultural productivity. The results indicate that the HBP has a significant positive effect on agricultural productivity growth in counties where the program was implemented. Further heterogeneity analysis reveals that the HBP has predominantly positive effects on agricultural productivity growth in counties located in the Central region, as well as those with low topographic relief or low temperatures. In contrast, no significant effects were observed in counties located in the Northeastern region. Mechanism analysis suggests that public investment in agriculture not only enhances agricultural productivity by improving irrigation infrastructure and increasing agricultural machinery, but also by encouraging scaled agricultural operations. Therefore, increasing public investment in agriculture is crucial for the growth of agricultural productivity. In this regard, China's practices are worthy of emulation by other developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Siqi & Cai, Rong & Wang, Shujuan, 2025. "Impact of public investment on agricultural productivity growth: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1442-1455.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:1442-1455
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:1442-1455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.