IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v85y2025icp1176-1196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do different decentralization reforms prohibit or inhibit Chinese corporate carbon emission intensities?

Author

Listed:
  • Bian, Zhiqiang
  • Zhang, Caibin

Abstract

Decentralization reforms have changed both the constraints and decision-making objectives of local governments, which may affect the carbon emission behaviors of enterprises within their jurisdictions. In this study, Chinese industrial enterprises from 2001 to 2010 were selected as the research sample, and two reforms of province-managing-county and county power expansion were used as quasi-natural experiments. The impact of different decentralization reforms on the carbon emission intensity of enterprises was analyzed using the difference-in-differences method. The empirical results show that fiscal decentralization can inhibit the carbon emission intensity of enterprises, and the reduction of enterprise energy consumption and the increase of green investment are the action channels. Administrative decentralization can promote the carbon emission intensity of enterprises; increasing enterprise energy consumption, decreasing energy utilization efficiency, expanding production scale, and decreasing green investment are the action channels. The results of heterogeneity analysis show that the impact of both types of decentralization reforms on the carbon emission intensity of different enterprises differs significantly; this is caused by differences in the ownership type, the emission intensive level, and the level of environmental regulation in the region they are located. The findings of this study help to better understand the relationship between government decentralization and corporate carbon emission behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bian, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Caibin, 2025. "Do different decentralization reforms prohibit or inhibit Chinese corporate carbon emission intensities?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1176-1196.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:1176-1196
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.01.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.01.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal decentralization reform; Administrative decentralization reform; Corporate carbon emission intensity; Energy consumption; Scale of production; Green investment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:1176-1196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.