IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v84y2024icp1730-1746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How antitrust enforcement affects corporate ESG performance? Evidence from merger review cases in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yi, Fang
  • Cao, Chenru
  • Xu, Jingxuan

Abstract

Chinese unique treatment of unreported merger cases (which should be reported according to antitrust law) in the context of merger review provides a distinctive and robust control group for the Difference-in-Differences (DID) research method. We employ the DID method to investigate the impact of China’s merger review antitrust enforcement on Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance. We find that the implementation of merger review antitrust enforcement suppresses corporate ESG performance, especially with significant effects observed on the Environment (E) and Governance (G) components. Mechanism analysis indicates that antitrust enforcement poses an impact on corporate profits by reducing market concentration and safeguarding fair market competition. This leads to the emergence of corporate financial performance protection behaviors, resulting in a decrease in corporate ESG performance. Heterogeneous analysis finds that the use of structural remedy in the enforcement process and stronger antitrust enforcement will further intensify the inhibitory effect of antitrust enforcement against business concentration on ESG.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi, Fang & Cao, Chenru & Xu, Jingxuan, 2024. "How antitrust enforcement affects corporate ESG performance? Evidence from merger review cases in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1730-1746.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:84:y:2024:i:c:p:1730-1746
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002923
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:84:y:2024:i:c:p:1730-1746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.