IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v32y2002i2p159-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Quantitative Methods in Economics: Alternatives to Theorem and Proof and Chalk and Talk

Author

Listed:
  • Becker, William E.

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

The recent literature on stock markets has used modern time series techniques such as cointegration and causality to identify macroeconomic variables that cause stock index movements. But this type of investigation has to a large extent remained confined to markets belonging to well developed and diversified economies. Motivated by the lack of set-ups involving stock markets from economies with different profiles, this paper concentrates on the Kuwaiti stock market whose unique features as an oil-dependent economy render its investigation a useful exercise. Based on multivariate time-series techniques and using monthly data spanning the period September 1992 to December 1998, the investigation reveals three important factors that are believed to have long-term equilibrium effects on stock market prices in Kuwait. Oil prices, U.S. interest rates and real estate prices are found to form a cointegrating relationship with stock prices. The results in this paper indicate clearly a sharp contrast in terms of stock market dynamics between an oil-dependent economy like Kuwait’s and those of highly diversified economies. It is argued that the reported results are nevertheless logical in light of the unique features of the oil-dependent Kuwaiti economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Becker, William E., 2002. "Teaching Quantitative Methods in Economics: Alternatives to Theorem and Proof and Chalk and Talk," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 159-180, June Spec.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:32:y:2002:i:2:p:159-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592602500278
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:32:y:2002:i:2:p:159-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.