IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v31y2001i1p25-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Fund Attrition on Superannuation Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Drew, Michael E.

    (Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane)

  • Stanford, Jon D.

    (University of Queensland, Brisbane)

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of fund attrition on returns from a sample of superannuation fund managers (specialising in the management of domestic stock portfolios) for the period 1991 through 1999, using a four-factor asset pricing model. Survivorship bias is estimated at 23 basis points per annum. The evidence presented in this study is consistent with recent international evidence that suggests that a sampling technique that excludes terminated funds would result in an overestimation of fund manager performance. Moreover, fund attrition has a material negative impact on the ability for superannuation fund members to obtain their retirement income objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Drew, Michael E. & Stanford, Jon D., 2001. "The Impact of Fund Attrition on Superannuation Returns," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 25-32, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:31:y:2001:i:1:p:25-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359260150003X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael E. Drew & Jon D. Stanford & Madhu Veeraraghavan, 2001. "Testing The Incomplete Arbitrate Hypothesis: Evidence From Australian Wholesale Superannuation Funds," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 099, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    2. Peter J. Phillips, 2011. "Will Self‐Managed Superannuation Fund Investors Survive?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 44(1), pages 51-63, March.
    3. Michael E. Drew & Jon D. Stanford, 2003. "Retail Superannuation Management in Australia: Risk, Cost and Alpha," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 126, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    4. Dr Jon D. Stanford & Michael E. Drew, 2003. "A Review Of Australia's Compulsory Superannuation Scheme After A Decade," Discussion Papers Series 322, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    5. Michael E. Drew & Jon D. Stanford, 2002. "The Economics of Choice of Superannuation Fund," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 102, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    6. Baumann, Chris & Hamin, Hamin, 2014. "Premium generic brand (PGB) choice vis-Ã -vis generic and national brands: A scenario comparison for self-use, family consumption and gift giving in a food versus non-food and cross-cultural context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 492-501.
    7. Danny Yeung, 2012. "The Impact of Institutional Ownership: A Study of the Australian Equity Market," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 11, July-Dece.
    8. Michael E. Drew & Jon D. Stanford, 2003. "Principal and Agent Problems in Superannuation Funds," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 36(1), pages 98-107.
    9. Chris Bilson & Angela Frino & Richard Heaney, 2005. "Australian retail fund performance persistence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 45(1), pages 25-42, March.
    10. Baumann, Chris & Hoadley, Susan & Hamin, Hamin & Nugraha, Albert, 2017. "Competitiveness vis-Ã -vis service quality as drivers of customer loyalty mediated by perceptions of regulation and stability in steady and volatile markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-74.
    11. Dr Jon D. Stanford & Michael E. Drew, 2003. "A Review Of Australia's Compulsory Superannuation Scheme After A Decade," Discussion Papers Series 322, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:31:y:2001:i:1:p:25-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.