IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v30y2000i1p91-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Royalties: "Have a Disincentive Effect on Production"?

Author

Listed:
  • Fraser, Rob

    (University of Western Australia)

  • Rygnestad, Hild

    (University of Western Australia)

Abstract

This paper analyses the impact of royalties in the context of a bilateral monopoly bargaining process. It is shown that the bilateral monopoly model is characterised by two distinct forms which are distinguished by the shape of the sellers marginal cost function. It is also shown that the output effect of introduction of royalties is ambiguous bot because of the role of the bargaining process and because of these two distinct forms of bilateral monopoly. Therefore, it is argued that no unambiguous conclusion can be reached regarding the impact of imposing royalties on the level of production.

Suggested Citation

  • Fraser, Rob & Rygnestad, Hild, 2000. "Do Royalties: "Have a Disincentive Effect on Production"?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 91-97, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:30:y:2000:i:1:p:91-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592600500071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Smith, 1977. "Bilateral Monopoly and Export Price Bargaining in the Resource Goods Trade," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 53(1), pages 30-50, March.
    2. repec:bla:ecorec:v:59:y:1983:i:166:p:232-44 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:bla:ecorec:v:53:y:1977:i:141:p:30-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colley, Peter, 1998. "Trading practices in the coal market: Application of the theory of bilateral monopoly to the Australia-Japan coal trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 59-75, March.
    2. Oczkowski, Edward, 1998. "An econometric analysis of the bilateral monopoly model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 53-69, January.
    3. Koerner, Richard J., 2001. "Determination of Japanese buyer valuation of metallurgical coal characteristics by hedonic modeling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 179-197, September.
    4. Koerner, Richard J, 1998. "The influence of sogo shosha companies on contract bargaining in the Pacific metallurgical coal trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 167-177, September.
    5. Sabala, Ethan & Devadoss, Stephen, 2021. "Analysis of Chinese Tariff on Sorghum Market under Varying Market Structures," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(1), January.
    6. Piggott, Roley R., 1992. "Some Old Truths Revisited," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 1-24, August.
    7. David L. Anderson, 1986. "Marketing Arrangements for Western Canadian Coking Coal," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 12(3), pages 473-483, September.
    8. Fraser, Rob W., 1999. "The state of resource taxation in Australia: 'An inexcusable folly for the nation'?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(3), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Graham, Paul & Thorpe, Sally & Hogan, Lindsay, 1999. "Non-competitive market behaviour in the international coking coal market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 195-212, June.
    10. Piggott, Roley R., 1992. "Some Old Truths Revisited," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147251, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:30:y:2000:i:1:p:91-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.