IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/deveco/v17y1985i1p141-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit, rent and the terms of trade

Author

Listed:
  • Andrews, Margaret S.

Abstract

In response to my article in this issue, Gibson and McLeod argue that, by ignoring a viability condition, I incorrectly conclude that a positive profit rate is not necessary for the perverse profit response. Furthermore, they argue that a positive profit rate, not the technology parameters, is the profoundly important social determinant of their original result. It is shown here that the imposition of the viability condition does not contradict my conclusion. The relevance ascribed by Gibson and McLeod to their positive profit rate condition is disputed and an unexpected relationship between rural wages and profit rates is uncovered. Technology is again shown to be the modulator of the distributional struggle. Finally, the empirical evidence presented by Gibson and McLeod in support of a fixed-profit equilibrium trap for U.S. agriculture is examined and its relevance questioned.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrews, Margaret S., 1985. "Profit, rent and the terms of trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 141-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:deveco:v:17:y:1985:i:1:p:141-149
    DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(85)90027-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304387885900276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0304-3878(85)90027-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrews, Margaret S., 1985. "Agricultural terms of trade and distributional perversities in a neo-Ricardian model," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 117-129.
    2. Gibson, Bill & McLeod, Darryl, 1985. "Profit, rent and the terms of trade : A reply," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 131-139.
    3. Gibson, Bill & McLeod, Darryl, 1982. "Terms-of-trade policy in a model with non-produced means of production," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 31-45, February.
    4. Gibson, Bill & McLeod, Darryl, 1985. "Profit, rent and the terms of trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 131-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amitava Krishna Dutt, 1989. "Sectoral Balance: A Survey," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1989-056, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amitava Krishna Dutt, 1989. "Sectoral Balance: A Survey," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1989-056, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Gibson, Bill & McLeod, Darryl, 1985. "Profit, rent and the terms of trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 131-139.
    3. Andrews, Margaret S., 1985. "Agricultural terms of trade and distributional perversities in a neo-Ricardian model," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 117-129.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:deveco:v:17:y:1985:i:1:p:141-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/devec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.