IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i8p1952-1961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of three-level orthogonal saturated designs

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Ying
  • Chan, Chi Kin
  • Leung, Bartholomew P.K.

Abstract

Although three-level factorial designs with quantitative factors are not the most efficient way to fit a second-order polynomial model, they often find some application, when the factors are qualitative. The three-level orthogonal designs with qualitative factors are frequently used, e.g., in agriculture, in clinical trials and in parameter designs. It is practically unavoidable that, because of the limitation of experimental materials or time-related constraint, we often have to keep the number of experiments as small as possible and to consider the effects of many factors and interactions simultaneously so that most of such designs are saturated or nearly saturated. An experimental design is said to be saturated, if all degrees of freedom are consumed by the estimation of parameters in modelling mean response. The difficulty of analyzing orthogonal saturated designs is that there are no degrees of freedom left to estimate the error variance so that the ordinary ANOVA is no longer available. In this paper, we present a new formal test, which is based on mean squares, for analyzing three-level orthogonal saturated designs. This proposed method is compared via simulation with several mean squares based methods published in the literature. The results show that the new method is more powerful in terms of empirical power of the test. Critical values used in the proposed procedure for some three-level saturated designs are tabulated. Industrial examples are also included for illustrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Ying & Chan, Chi Kin & Leung, Bartholomew P.K., 2010. "An analysis of three-level orthogonal saturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1952-1961, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:8:p:1952-1961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00083-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langsrud, Oyvind & Naes, Tormod, 1998. "A unified framework for significance testing in fractional factorials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 413-431, October.
    2. Aboukalam, M. A. F. & Al-Shiha, A. A., 2001. "A robust analysis for unreplicated factorial experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 31-46, March.
    3. Lawson, John & Grimshaw, Scott & Burt, Jason, 1998. "A quantitative method for identifying active contrasts in unreplicated factorial designs based on the half-normal plot," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 425-436, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawson, John, 2002. "Regression analysis of experiments with complex confounding patterns guided by the alias matrix," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 227-241, April.
    2. Georgiou, S. & Koukouvinos, C. & Stylianou, S., 2004. "Construction of new skew Hadamard matrices and their use in screening experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 423-429, April.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:25:i13 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Øyvind Langsrud & Kjetil Jørgensen & Ragni Ofstad & Tormod Næs, 2007. "Analyzing Designed Experiments with Multiple Responses," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(10), pages 1275-1296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:8:p:1952-1961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.