IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i9p3305-3313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the homogeneity of the means of several groups of count data in the presence of unequal dispersions

Author

Listed:
  • Saha, Krishna K.
  • Bilisoly, Roger

Abstract

Extra-dispersion (overdispersion or underdispersion) is a common phenomenon in practice when the variance of count data differs from that of a Poisson model. This can arise when the data come from different subpopulations or when the assumption of independence is violated. This paper develops a procedure for testing the equality of the means of several groups of counts, when extra-dispersions among the treatment groups are unequal, based on the adjusted counts using the concept of the design and size effects employed by Rao and Scott, [Rao, J.N.K., Scott, A.J., 1999. A simple method for analyzing overdispersion in clustered Poisson data. Statist. Med. 18, 1373-1385]. We also obtain the score-type test statistics based on quasi-likelihoods using the mean-variance structure of the negative binomial model, and study the properties and performance characteristics of these. The simulation results indicate that the statistic based on the adjusted count data, which has a very simple form and does not require the estimates of the extra-dispersion parameters, performs best among all the statistics considered in this paper. Finally, the proposed test statistic and the score-type statistic based on double-extended quasi-likelihood are illustrated by an analysis of a set of fetal implants in mice arising from a developmental toxicity study.

Suggested Citation

  • Saha, Krishna K. & Bilisoly, Roger, 2009. "Testing the homogeneity of the means of several groups of count data in the presence of unequal dispersions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3305-3313, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:3305-3313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00035-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. J. Faddy & R. J. Bosch, 2001. "Likelihood-Based Modeling and Analysis of Data Underdispersed Relative to the Poisson Distribution," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 620-624, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiu, Sung Nok & Wang, Ling, 2009. "Homogeneity tests for several Poisson populations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4266-4278, October.
    2. Park, Junyong & Park, DoHwan, 2012. "Testing the equality of a large number of normal population means," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1131-1149.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. I. Ricard & A. C. Davison, 2007. "Statistical inference for olfactometer data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 56(4), pages 479-492, August.
    2. Boris Forthmann & Philipp Doebler, 2021. "Reliability of researcher capacity estimates and count data dispersion: a comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and Conway-Maxwell-Poisson models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3337-3354, April.
    3. Choi, Yunhee & Ahn, Hongshik & Chen, James J., 2005. "Regression trees for analysis of count data with extra Poisson variation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 893-915, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:3305-3313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.