IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i3p812-819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling laboratory data from clinical trials

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenkranz, Gerd K.

Abstract

Abnormal laboratory data from clinical trials are considered precursors of potential organ dysfunction. Routine analysis of these data focusses primarily on the incidence of extremely high or low values relative to normal ranges, or the change of these incidences compared to baseline. Alternatively, the worst values from each individual patient are analyzed. Where feasible, graphical representations of the time course of lab measurements are displayed, often for each subject individually. However, only rarely is an attempt made to model the dynamics of the measurements over time. Stochastic processes can be used to model laboratory measurements and specifically Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes have some properties that are suitable for this purpose. Models based on these processes can account for potential systematic effects relevant for all or a group of subjects as well as the random variation between subjects. The idea is to estimate parameters of these processes in order to quantify effects of drugs or other medical treatments. Results based on simulations and real data will be presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenkranz, Gerd K., 2009. "Modeling laboratory data from clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 812-819, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:812-819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00341-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:812-819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.