IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i3p603-608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model

Author

Listed:
  • Leon, Andrew C.
  • Heo, Moonseong

Abstract

Mixed-effects linear regression models have become more widely used for analysis of repeatedly measured outcomes in clinical trials over the past decade. There are formulae and tables for estimating sample sizes required to detect the main effects of treatment and the treatment by time interactions for those models. A formula is proposed to estimate the sample size required to detect an interaction between two binary variables in a factorial design with repeated measures of a continuous outcome. The formula is based, in part, on the fact that the variance of an interaction is fourfold that of the main effect. A simulation study examines the statistical power associated with the resulting sample sizes in a mixed-effects linear regression model with a random intercept. The simulation varies the magnitude ([Delta]) of the standardized main effects and interactions, the intraclass correlation coefficient ([rho]), and the number (k) of repeated measures within-subject. The results of the simulation study verify that the sample size required to detect a 22 interaction in a mixed-effects linear regression model is fourfold that to detect a main effect of the same magnitude.

Suggested Citation

  • Leon, Andrew C. & Heo, Moonseong, 2009. "Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 603-608, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:603-608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00324-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Block, Ray & Burnham, Michael & Kahn, Kayla & Peng, Rachel & Seeman, Jeremy & Seto, Christopher, 2022. "Perceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Meager, Rachael, 2022. "Aggregating distributional treatment effects: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the microcredit literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115559, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Emily K. Ninmer & Hong Zhu & Kimberly A. Chianese-Bullock & Margaret Mehren & Naomi B. Haas & Merrick I. Ross & Lynn T. Dengel & Craig L. Slingluff, 2024. "Multipeptide vaccines for melanoma in the adjuvant setting: long-term survival outcomes and post-hoc analysis of a randomized phase II trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Maeve Lorraine O’Connell & Tara Coppinger & Seán Lacey & Tijana Arsenic & Aoife Louise McCarthy, 2021. "The Gender-Specific Relationship between Nutritional Status, Physical Activity and Functional Mobility in Irish Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Quinn A. W. Keefer, 2022. "Sex Differences in High-Level Managerial Jobs: Evidence From Professional Basketball," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(3), pages 301-328, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:603-608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.