IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v52y2008i11p5022-5032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of titer estimation methods for multiplexed pneumococcal opsonophagocytic killing assay

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, D.
  • Soong, S.-J.

Abstract

Titer estimation is one of the major components of immunoassay and vaccine development. A multiplexed in vitro opsonization assay (MOPA) is widely accepted to quantitate Streptococcus pneumococcal antibodies to serotype-specific pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide. Titer estimation of vaccine based on OPA is one important component of standardization of OPA, and the selected statistical method is a factor influencing the accuracy and precision of titer estimation. We evaluated five titer estimation methods for pneumococcal OPA in terms of precision and accuracy using three data sets generated by specifically designed experiments with both an eight-dilution and an eleven-dilution design. The bootstrap resampling technique was also used to determine the performance of the estimation. We concluded that the traditional direct method did not perform as well as the other four methods in terms of precision and accuracy of titer estimation. The Spearman-Kärber estimator might be biased upward for OPA titer estimation. The four-parameter logistic model (4PL) method is an alternative choice for OPA titer estimation. The eleven-dilution design provided more information than the eight-dilution design for titer estimation and enhanced precision of estimators. UAB opsotiter, computer software using the statistical language R and Microsoft Excel®, was developed to implement OPA titer estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, D. & Soong, S.-J., 2008. "Comparisons of titer estimation methods for multiplexed pneumococcal opsonophagocytic killing assay," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 5022-5032, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:11:p:5022-5032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00228-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:11:p:5022-5032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.