IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v52y2008i11p4989-4997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Andersen-Gill model with poisson and negative binomial regression on recurrent event data

Author

Listed:
  • Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje

Abstract

Many generalizations of the Cox proportional hazard method have been elaborated to analyse recurrent event data. The Andersen-Gill model was proposed to handle event data following Poisson processes. This method is compared with non-survival approaches, such as Poisson and negative binomial regression. The comparison is performed on data simulated according to various event-generating processes and differing in subject heterogeneity. When robust standard error estimates are applied, for Poisson processes the Andersen-Gill approach is comparable to a negative binomial regression, whereas the poisson regression has comparable coverage probabilities of confidence intervals, but increased type I error rates; however, none of the methods can generate unbiased parameter estimates with data violating the independent increment assumption. These findings are illustrated by data from a clinical trial of the efficacy of a new pneumococcal vaccine for prevention of otitis media.

Suggested Citation

  • Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje, 2008. "Comparison of the Andersen-Gill model with poisson and negative binomial regression on recurrent event data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 4989-4997, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:11:p:4989-4997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00215-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 1996. "Events," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 8(2), pages 287-288, September.
    2. James Vaupel & Kenneth Manton & Eric Stallard, 1979. "The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 16(3), pages 439-454, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Babykina, Génia & Couallier, Vincent, 2012. "Empirical assessment of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator quality in a parametric counting process model for recurrent events," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 297-315.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagdonavicius, Vilijandas & Nikulin, Mikhail, 2000. "On goodness-of-fit for the linear transformation and frailty models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 177-188, April.
    2. Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond, 2016. "Age-Specific Adjustment of Graduated Mortality," Working Papers hal-01391285, HAL.
    3. Feehan, Dennis & Wrigley-Field, Elizabeth, 2020. "How do populations aggregate?," SocArXiv 2fkw3, Center for Open Science.
    4. M. K. Lintu & Asha Kamath, 2022. "Performance of recurrent event models on defect proneness data," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 2209-2218, August.
    5. Il Do Ha & Maengseok Noh & Youngjo Lee, 2010. "Bias Reduction of Likelihood Estimators in Semiparametric Frailty Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 307-320, June.
    6. Andreas Wienke & Anne M. Herskind & Kaare Christensen & Axel Skytthe & Anatoli I. Yashin, 2002. "The influence of smoking and BMI on heritability in susceptibility to coronary heart disease," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    7. Svetlana V. Ukraintseva & Anatoli I. Yashin, 2005. "Economic progress as cancer risk factor. I: Puzzling facts of cancer epidemiology," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2005-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    8. Silke van Daalen & Hal Caswell, 2015. "Lifetime reproduction and the second demographic transition: Stochasticity and individual variation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(20), pages 561-588.
    9. K. Motarjem & M. Mohammadzadeh & A. Abyar, 2020. "Geostatistical survival model with Gaussian random effect," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 85-107, February.
    10. Schultz, T. Paul, 2010. "Population and Health Policies," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4785-4881, Elsevier.
    11. Xu, Linzhi & Zhang, Jiajia, 2010. "An EM-like algorithm for the semiparametric accelerated failure time gamma frailty model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1467-1474, June.
    12. Carlos Díaz-Venegas, 2014. "Identifying the Confounders of Marginalization and Mortality in Mexico, 2003–2007," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 851-875, September.
    13. Väinö Kannisto, 2000. "Measuring the compression of mortality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 3(6).
    14. Jaap H. Abbring & Tim Salimans, 2019. "The Likelihood of Mixed Hitting Times," Papers 1905.03463, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    15. Annamaria Olivieri & Ermanno Pitacco, 2016. "Frailty and Risk Classification for Life Annuity Portfolios," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    16. James W. Vaupel, 2002. "Post-Darwinian longevity," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-043, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    17. Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2005. "Shocks in homogeneous and heterogeneous populations," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2005-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    18. Philip Verwimp & Davide Osti & Gudrun Østby, 2020. "Forced Displacement, Migration, and Fertility in Burundi," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 287-319, June.
    19. Luping Zhao & Timothy E. Hanson, 2011. "Spatially Dependent Polya Tree Modeling for Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 391-403, June.
    20. repec:wyi:journl:002122 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Yeo, Keng Leong & Valdez, Emiliano A., 2006. "Claim dependence with common effects in credibility models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 609-629, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:11:p:4989-4997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.