IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v51y2006i3p1602-1613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved inference on a scalar fixed effect of interest in nonlinear mixed-effects models

Author

Listed:
  • Guolo, Annamaria
  • Brazzale, Alessandra R.
  • Salvan, Alessandra

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Guolo, Annamaria & Brazzale, Alessandra R. & Salvan, Alessandra, 2006. "Improved inference on a scalar fixed effect of interest in nonlinear mixed-effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1602-1613, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:3:p:1602-1613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(06)00181-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manor, Orly & Zucker, D.M.David M., 2004. "Small sample inference for the fixed effects in the mixed linear model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 801-817, July.
    2. Maria Durban & I. D. Currie, 2000. "Adjustment of the Profile Likelihood for a Class of Normal Regression Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 535-542, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stein, Markus Chagas & da Silva, Michel Ferreira & Duczmal, Luiz Henrique, 2014. "Alternatives to the usual likelihood ratio test in mixed linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 184-197.
    2. Ventura, Laura & Sartori, Nicola & Racugno, Walter, 2013. "Objective Bayesian higher-order asymptotics in models with nuisance parameters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 90-96.
    3. Yoshifumi Ukyo & Hisashi Noma & Kazushi Maruo & Masahiko Gosho, 2019. "Improved Small Sample Inference Methods for a Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures Approach in Incomplete Longitudinal Data Analysis," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McNabb, Carolyn Beth & Murayama, Kou, 2021. "Unnecessary reliance on multilevel modelling to analyse nested data in neuroscience: When a traditional summary-statistics approach suffices," OSF Preprints h4s9f, Center for Open Science.
    2. Martellosio, Federico & Hillier, Grant, 2020. "Adjusted QMLE for the spatial autoregressive parameter," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 488-506.
    3. Vargas, Tiago M. & Ferrari, Silvia L.P. & Lemonte, Artur J., 2014. "Improved likelihood inference in generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 110-124.
    4. Yu, Dalei & Bai, Peng & Ding, Chang, 2015. "Adjusted quasi-maximum likelihood estimator for mixed regressive, spatial autoregressive model and its small sample bias," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 116-135.
    5. Elff, Martin & Heisig, Jan Paul & Schaeffer, Merlin & Shikano, Susumu, 2016. "No Need to Turn Bayesian in Multilevel Analysis with Few Clusters: How Frequentist Methods Provide Unbiased Estimates and Accurate Inference," SocArXiv z65s4, Center for Open Science.
    6. Federico Martellosio & Grant Hillier, 2019. "Adjusted QMLE for the spatial autoregressive parameter," Papers 1909.08141, arXiv.org.
    7. Céline Cunen & Nils Lid Hjort, 2022. "Combining information across diverse sources: The II‐CC‐FF paradigm," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 625-656, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:3:p:1602-1613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.