IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v207y2025ics0167947325000210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentially private estimation of weighted average treatment effects for binary outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Guha, Sharmistha
  • Reiter, Jerome P.

Abstract

In the social and health sciences, researchers often make causal inferences using sensitive variables. These researchers, as well as the data holders themselves, may be ethically and perhaps legally obligated to protect the confidentiality of study participants' data. It is now known that releasing any statistics, including estimates of causal effects, computed with confidential data leaks information about the underlying data values. Thus, analysts may desire to use causal estimators that can provably bound this information leakage. Motivated by this goal, new algorithms are developed for estimating weighted average treatment effects with binary outcomes that satisfy the criterion of differential privacy. Theoretical results are presented on the accuracy of several differentially private estimators of weighted average treatment effects. Empirical evaluations using simulated data and a causal analysis involving education and income data illustrate the performance of these estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Guha, Sharmistha & Reiter, Jerome P., 2025. "Differentially private estimation of weighted average treatment effects for binary outcomes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s0167947325000210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2025.108145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947325000210
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2025.108145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s0167947325000210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.