IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v23y2012i6p483-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinarity and tax law: The case of legal autopoiesis

Author

Listed:
  • Vilaça, Guilherme Vasconcelos

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates interdisciplinary research in tax law. The strategy I follow runs at two levels of abstraction.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilaça, Guilherme Vasconcelos, 2012. "Interdisciplinarity and tax law: The case of legal autopoiesis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 483-492.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:483-492
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235412000561
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mete, Pamela & Dick, Caroline & Moerman, Lee, 2010. "Creating institutional meaning: Accounting and taxation law perspectives of carbon permits," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 619-630.
    2. Hikaka, Geraldine & Prebble, John, 2010. "Autopoiesis and general anti-avoidance rules," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 545-559.
    3. Tuck, Penelope, 2010. "The emergence of the tax official into a T-shaped knowledge expert," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 584-596.
    4. Marriott, Lisa, 2010. "Power and ideas: The development of retirement savings taxation in Australasia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 597-610.
    5. James, Malcolm, 2010. "Humpty Dumpty's guide to tax law: Rules, principles and certainty in taxation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 573-583.
    6. Merchant, Kenneth A., 2008. "Why interdisciplinary accounting research tends not to impact most North American academic accountants," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 901-908.
    7. Norton, Simon D., 2012. "Judicial interpretation of the will of the state: A Hegelian perspective in the context of taxation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 117-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norton, Simon D., 2012. "Judicial interpretation of the will of the state: A Hegelian perspective in the context of taxation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 117-133.
    2. Boll, Karen, 2014. "Mapping tax compliance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 293-303.
    3. Dellaportas, Steven & Xu, Lina & Yang, Zhiqiang, 2022. "The level of cross-disciplinarity in cross-disciplinary accounting research: analysis and suggestions for improvement," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Chapman, Christopher S., 2018. "Interpretive methodological expertise and editorial board composition," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 47-51.
    5. Allan Hansen, 2011. "Relating performative and ostensive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 108-138, June.
    6. Everett, Jeff, 2008. "Editorial proximity equals publication success: A function of rational self-interest or good-faith economy?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1149-1176.
    7. Björklund Larsen, Lotta, 2015. "Common sense at the Swedish Tax Agency: Transactional boundaries that separate taxable and tax-free income," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 75-89.
    8. Raitasuo, Santtu, 2024. "The conflict of interest in tax scholarship," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Farrar, Jonathan, 2011. "Tax fairness in Canadian government budgets: How fair is ‘fair’?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 365-375.
    10. eccleston, richard & Verdouw, Julia & Flanagan, Kathleen & Warren, Neil & Duncan, Alan & Ong, Rachel & Whelan, Stephen & Atalay, Kadir & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Pathways to housing tax reform," SocArXiv 8xrbe, Center for Open Science.
    11. Nurunnabi, Mohammad, 2014. "The role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in a developing economy: Implications for IFRS," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 413-424.
    12. Gårseth-Nesbakk, Levi, 2011. "Accrual accounting representations in the public sector—A case of autopoiesis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 247-258.
    13. Andrew, Jane & Baker, Max & Cooper, Christine & Tweedie, Jonathan, 2024. "Wealth taxes and the post-COVID future of the state," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Carter, Chris & Clegg, Stewart & Wåhlin, Nils, 2011. "When science meets strategic realpolitik: The case of the Copenhagen UN climate change summit," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 682-697.
    15. Gracia, Louise & Oats, Lynne, 2012. "Boundary work and tax regulation: A Bourdieusian view," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 304-321.
    16. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles H. & Bothello, Joel, 2023. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Roberts, Robin W. & Wallace, Dana M., 2015. "Sustaining diversity in social and environmental accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 78-87.
    18. Deegan, Craig, 2017. "Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 65-87.
    19. Kachelmeier, Steven J., 2018. "Do journals signal or reflect? An alternative perspective on editorial board composition," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 62-69.
    20. De Widt, Dennis & Oats, Lynne, 2024. "Imagining cooperative tax regulation: Common origins, divergent paths," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:483-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.