IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v191y2025ics0960077924014760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unbiased evacuations processes using a reinforcement learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Encina, Nikolas N.
  • Carrasco, Sebastian C.
  • Ramirez, Max
  • Rogan, José
  • Valdivia, Juan Alejandro

Abstract

Simulations of collective phenomena require the modeling of individual choices. In evacuations, handpicked policies may produce biased results. Here, we remove that bias using reinforcement learning. This technique allows for the construction of non-optimal solutions of each agent’s trajectory but improves the performance of the whole ensemble. Our analysis reveals that evacuation time can decrease up to 12% compared to the strategy of following the shortest path, which is a more standard approach. Our simulations also show that the reinforcement algorithm causes the agents to distribute themselves in a more homogeneous way while advancing towards the exits, resulting in fewer collisions. Moreover, we found, as expected, that collisions and evacuation time are strongly correlated and discovered that such a relationship is policy-independent. Our work opens up new research venues to study evacuations and leverages the potentiality of new machine-learning techniques to study collective phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Encina, Nikolas N. & Carrasco, Sebastian C. & Ramirez, Max & Rogan, José & Valdivia, Juan Alejandro, 2025. "Unbiased evacuations processes using a reinforcement learning approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924014760
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924014760
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924014760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.