IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v191y2025ics0960077924014310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring cognitive inertia in opinion dynamics using an activity-driven model

Author

Listed:
  • Pranesh, Samana
  • Gupta, Sayan

Abstract

The advent of social media platforms has revolutionized information consumption patterns, with individuals frequently engaging in these platforms for social interactions. This trend has fostered an environment where people gravitate towards information that aligns with their preconceived notions, leading to the formation of echo chambers and polarization within the society. Recently introduced activity-driven models have been successful in capturing the dynamics of information propagation and polarization. The present study uses this model to explore cognitive inertia, which captures the tendency of individuals to maintain (positive) or shift away (negative) from their prior beliefs. In the case of positive cognitive inertia, individuals are more likely to maintain their current beliefs, becoming resistant to external influences and reinforcing polarization. In contrast, negative cognitive inertia reflects a tendency to move away from prior opinions, promoting the reconsideration or rejection of previously held views. A supercritical pitchfork bifurcation is observed, triggering a transition from polarization to consensus. The transition points from polarization to consensus are derived analytically and is validated through numerical simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pranesh, Samana & Gupta, Sayan, 2025. "Exploring cognitive inertia in opinion dynamics using an activity-driven model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924014310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924014310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924014310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.