IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v157y2022ics0960077922000613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Phase transitions” in small systems: Why standard threshold definitions fail for nanolasers

Author

Listed:
  • Lippi, G.L.
  • Wang, T.
  • Puccioni, G.P.

Abstract

Since the development of micro- and nanolasers, the question of laser threshold has been subject to debate. Different definitions have been used to try and establish its occurrence, often encountering major obstacles. We examine a set of common physical definitions which we apply to measurements taken in a micro-VCSEL. Their predictions not only clearly disagree, pointing to different pump values at which the laser should cross threshold, but they also correspond to autocorrelation values which demonstrate very low field coherence. A topological analysis of the rate equations, with average spontaneous emission added to the lasing mode, clearly identifies the contradictions and explains the origin of the discrepancies. Additional considerations help understanding the failure of the approach and highlight the path towards a unique and general definition of threshold in all lasers, irrespective of their sizes. A critical scrutiny of the assumptions made in the rate equations with spontaneous emission illustrates their strength and weaknesses and better defines the bounds within which their predictions hold. We remark in the conclusions how the main results of this paper could hold for other small systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lippi, G.L. & Wang, T. & Puccioni, G.P., 2022. "“Phase transitions” in small systems: Why standard threshold definitions fail for nanolasers," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922000613
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077922000613
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Wiersig & C. Gies & F. Jahnke & M. Aßmann & T. Berstermann & M. Bayer & C. Kistner & S. Reitzenstein & C. Schneider & S. Höfling & A. Forchel & C. Kruse & J. Kalden & D. Hommel, 2009. "Direct observation of correlations between individual photon emission events of a microcavity laser," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7252), pages 245-249, July.
    2. M. Khajavikhan & A. Simic & M. Katz & J. H. Lee & B. Slutsky & A. Mizrahi & V. Lomakin & Y. Fainman, 2012. "Thresholdless nanoscale coaxial lasers," Nature, Nature, vol. 482(7384), pages 204-207, February.
    3. Stefan T. Jagsch & Noelia Vico Triviño & Frederik Lohof & Gordon Callsen & Stefan Kalinowski & Ian M. Rousseau & Roy Barzel & Jean-François Carlin & Frank Jahnke & Raphaël Butté & Christopher Gies & A, 2018. "A quantum optical study of thresholdless lasing features in high-β nitride nanobeam cavities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mondher Besbes & Christophe Sauvan, 2022. "Role of Static Modes in Quasinormal Modes Expansions: When and How to Take Them into Account?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922000613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.