IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v89y2025ics1043951x24002153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of African civil conflicts on FDI: The moderating role of bilateral political relations

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Hao
  • Tang, Bin
  • Dai, Li

Abstract

Civil conflicts have replaced international conflicts as the primary political risk to the stability and prosperity of Africa, bringing uncertainty to foreign direct investment (FDI). Meanwhile, closer bilateral political relations provide institutional guarantee to safeguard the interests of stakeholders. This paper investigates the influence of civil conflicts on foreign direct investment in Africa, and the modulating role of bilateral political relations between home and host countries. We relax the assumption that all forms of civil conflicts are homogenous in the effects on FDI and construct a unique data set for FDI to Africa from China, the United States, and Europe between 2013 and 2019. The study results show significant FDI-deterring effects of civil conflict and one-sided violence, with the former more pronounced in low-income and sub-Saharan African countries and to Chinese and British investors. And closer bilateral political relations can alleviate the detrimental effects of civil conflicts, especially one-sided violence, on FDI. Our findings confirm the strategic role of bilateral relationship in ensuring the interest of Chinese multinational corporations and the stability and prosperity of African countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Hao & Tang, Bin & Dai, Li, 2025. "The effects of African civil conflicts on FDI: The moderating role of bilateral political relations," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:89:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x24002153
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24002153
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:89:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x24002153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.