IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v61y2018i3p385-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking competitiveness through scent names: A data-driven approach

Author

Listed:
  • Meng, Hua (Meg)
  • Zamudio, César
  • Jewell, Robert D.

Abstract

Naming a product’s scent is a key decision. The same scent can be interpreted differently when different names are assigned to it. Thus, choosing the right scent name can increase competitiveness by successfully appealing to desired consumer segments. We propose that such decisions should be data driven (i.e., on the basis of competitors’ offerings and consumers’ preferences) and provide guidelines on how to assign scent names to products in home care and personal care product categories, focusing on capturing market segments. Based on a large web-based dataset of scented products across multiple brands and categories, this article is the first to construct a typology of scent names empirically: unscented, concrete, abstract, and proprietary. After examining firms’ assortments of scented products with different names across 12 categories and comparing them with consumers’ preferences concerning such assortments, we identify major gaps. Overall, consumers demand far more unscented products and products with abstract names than currently offered; however, preferences for products with proprietary names are mostly aligned. Strategic recommendations center on naming scented products to better align supply and demand in the scented product market and capture new market opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng, Hua (Meg) & Zamudio, César & Jewell, Robert D., 2018. "Unlocking competitiveness through scent names: A data-driven approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 385-395.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:61:y:2018:i:3:p:385-395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681318300041
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilson, Elizabeth J., 2005. "The nose knows: new product development at Yankee Candle Company," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(7), pages 989-994, July.
    2. Caress, S.M. & Steinemann, A.C., 2004. "Prevalence of Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: A Population-Based Study in the Southeastern United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(5), pages 746-747.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Nordin & Linus Andersson & Steven Nordin, 2010. "Coping strategies, social support and responsibility in chemical intolerance," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2162-2173, August.
    2. Anne A. Bjerregaard & Marie W. Petersen & Lise Kirstine Gormsen & Sine Skovbjerg & Niklas R. Jørgensen & Allan Linneberg & José G. Cedeño-Laurent & Torben Jørgensen & Thomas M. Dantoft, 2021. "Insulin Resistance Is Associated with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity in a Danish Population-Based Study—DanFunD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Sandra Fares-Medina & Isabel Díaz-Caro & Rebeca García-Montes & Inmaculada Corral-Liria & Soledad García-Gómez-Heras, 2022. "Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome: First Symptoms and Evolution of the Clinical Picture: Case-Control Study/Epidemiological Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Anne A. Bjerregaard & Marie W. Petersen & Sine Skovbjerg & Lise K. Gormsen & José G. Cedeño-Laurent & Torben Jørgensen & Allan Linneberg & Thomas Meinertz Dantoft, 2022. "Physiological Health and Physical Performance in Multiple Chemical Sensitivity—Described in the General Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Raymond F. Palmer & Tatjana Walker & David Kattari & Rudy Rincon & Roger B. Perales & Carlos R. Jaén & Carl Grimes & Dana R. Sundblad & Claudia S. Miller, 2021. "Validation of a Brief Screening Instrument for Chemical Intolerance in a Large U.S. National Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:61:y:2018:i:3:p:385-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.