IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v53y2021i5s0890838921000032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sell-side equity analysts and equity sales: A study of interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Kenneth
  • Manochin, Melina

Abstract

The extensive literature on sell-side analysts makes little reference to equity sales as a significant economic actor in the field. Drawing on a recent field study, our empirical evidence identified equity sales teams within brokers, who promote research to external clients, as a powerful agent cluster in close time-space proximity to analysts. This paper sheds light on analyst-sales interactions, which we contend represent an important field condition. The study employs concepts from strong structuration theory, in particular position-practice relations, to develop a narrative about sell-side analysts’ and sales team positional obligations, privileges, power relations and matters of trust. Our study makes three contributions. Firstly, we identify the symbiosis embedded in the relationship between sales and research - analysts need equity sales to market their product, to positively influence client perceptions of analysts and to provide access to prized fund managers. In turn, sales need analysts to provide content for them to market. Secondly, integral to sales-analyst interactions is the provision of feedback, which causes difficulties in the relationship, leaving analysts vulnerable to sales influence. Thirdly, regulatory tension has changed sales-analyst interactions, and this can enrich our understanding of why analysts continue to publish commoditised research into highly competitive markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Kenneth & Manochin, Melina, 2021. "Sell-side equity analysts and equity sales: A study of interaction," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:5:s0890838921000032
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2021.100977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838921000032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2021.100977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyn Daff & Lisa Jack, 2018. "Accountants’ proactivity in intra-organisational networks: a strong structuration perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 1691-1719, August.
    2. Roberts, John, 2014. "Testing the limits of structuration theory in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 135-141.
    3. Joel A. C. Baum & Anne Bowers & Partha Mohanram, 2016. "Mutual Forbearance and Competition Among Security Analysts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1610-1631, June.
    4. Boris Groysberg & Paul M. Healy & David A. Maber, 2011. "What Drives Sell‐Side Analyst Compensation at High‐Status Investment Banks?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 969-1000, September.
    5. Womack, Kent L, 1996. "Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 137-167, March.
    6. Nerissa C. Brown & Kelsey D. Wei & Russ Wermers, 2014. "Analyst Recommendations, Mutual Fund Herding, and Overreaction in Stock Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Boni, Leslie & Womack, Kent L., 2006. "Analysts, Industries, and Price Momentum," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 85-109, March.
    8. Alan Coad & Lisa Jack & Ahmed Kholeif, 2016. "Strong structuration theory in accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 1138-1144, September.
    9. Busse, Jeffrey A. & Clifton Green, T. & Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, 2012. "Buy-side trades and sell-side recommendations: Interactions and information content," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 207-232.
    10. Greenhalgh, Trisha & Stones, Rob, 2010. "Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1285-1294, May.
    11. Rob Stones & Lisa Jack, 2016. "The bridge between ontological concepts and empirical evidence: an interview with Rob Stones," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 1145-1151, September.
    12. Stefano Cascino & Mark Clatworthy & Beatriz García Osma & Joachim Gassen & Shahed Imam & Thomas Jeanjean, 2014. "Who Uses Financial Reports and for What Purpose? Evidence from Capital Providers," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 185-209, December.
    13. Green, T. Clifton & Jame, Russell & Markov, Stanimir & Subasi, Musa, 2014. "Access to management and the informativeness of analyst research," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 239-255.
    14. Leins, Stefan, 2018. "Stories of Capitalism," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226523422, December.
    15. Francis, J & Philbrick, D, 1993. "Analysts Decisions As Products Of A Multitask Environment," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 216-230.
    16. Michaely, Roni & Womack, Kent L, 1999. "Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 653-686.
    17. Eugene Soltes, 2014. "Private Interaction Between Firm Management and Sell‐Side Analysts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 245-272, March.
    18. Coad, Alan F. & Glyptis, Loukas G., 2014. "Structuration: A position–practice perspective and an illustrative study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 142-161.
    19. Orla Feeney & Bernard Pierce, 2016. "Strong structuration theory and accounting information: an empirical study," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 1152-1176, September.
    20. Leins, Stefan, 2018. "Stories of Capitalism," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226523392, Febrero.
    21. Clatworthy, Mark & Jones, Michael John, 2008. "Overseas equity analysis by UK analysts and fund managers," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 337-355.
    22. Hans Englund & Jonas Gerdin, 2016. "What can(not) a flat and local structuration ontology do for management accounting research?," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 252-263, June.
    23. David R.J. Moore & Ken McPhail, 2016. "Strong structuration and carbon accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 1204-1233, September.
    24. Alan Coad & Lisa Jack & Ahmed Othman Rashwan Kholeif, 2015. "Structuration theory: reflections on its further potential for management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 153-171, June.
    25. Lei Chen & Jo Danbolt & John Holland, 2018. "Information about bank intangibles, analyst information intermediation, and the role of knowledge and social forces in the ‘market for information’," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 261-276, September.
    26. Chen, Lei & Danbolt, Jo & Holland, John, 2018. "Information about bank intangibles, analyst information intermediation, and the role of knowledge and social forces in the ‘market for information’," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 261-276.
    27. Warren, Liz & Jack, Lisa, 2018. "The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - A strategic conduct analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 481-496.
    28. Subhash Abhayawansa & Evangeline Elijido‐Ten & John Dumay, 2019. "A practice theoretical analysis of the irrelevance of integrated reporting to mainstream sell‐side analysts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(3), pages 1615-1647, September.
    29. Richard Barker, 1998. "The market for information—evidence from finance directors, analysts and fund managers," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 3-20.
    30. Johan Graaf, 2018. "Equity market interactions," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 1230-1256, May.
    31. Shahed Imam & Crawford Spence, 2016. "Context, not predictions: a field study of financial analysts," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(2), pages 226-247, February.
    32. Kellard, Neil & Millo, Yuval & Simon, Jan & Engel, Ofer, 2017. "Close communications: hedge funds, brokers and the emergence of herding," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64766, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    33. Subhash Abhayawansa & Mark Aleksanyan & Suresh Cuganesan, 2018. "Conceptualisation of intellectual capital in analysts’ narratives: a performative view," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 950-969, March.
    34. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Rogers, Rodney K., 2005. "Financial analysts' reports: an extended institutional theory evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 331-356, May.
    35. Ambrus Kecskés & Roni Michaely & Kent L. Womack, 2017. "Do Earnings Estimates Add Value to Sell-Side Analysts’ Investment Recommendations?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1855-1871, June.
    36. Conrad, Lynne, 2014. "Reflections on the application of and potential for structuration theory in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 128-134.
    37. Elaine Pamela Harris & Deryl Northcott & Moataz Moamen Elmassri & Jari Huikku, 2016. "Theorising strategic investment decision-making using strong structuration theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 1177-1203, September.
    38. Daniel Bradley & Sinan Gokkaya & Xi Liu, 2017. "Before an Analyst Becomes an Analyst: Does Industry Experience Matter?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 751-792, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Kenneth & Aleksanyan, Mark & Harris, Elaine & Manochin, Melina, 2023. "Throwing in the towel: what happens when analysts' recommendations go wrong?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Kenneth & Manochin, Melina, 2021. "Sell-side equity analysts and equity sales: a study of interaction," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108953, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Lee, Kenneth & Aleksanyan, Mark & Harris, Elaine & Manochin, Melina, 2023. "Throwing in the towel: what happens when analysts' recommendations go wrong?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Daff, Lyn & Parker, Lee D., 2021. "A conceptual model of accountants' communication inside not-for-profit organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    4. Kennedy, Aileen & O'gorman, Colm & Lee, Kenneth, 2021. "Have your cake and eat it? Combining structure and agency in management research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112720, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Stolowy, Hervé & Paugam, Luc & Gendron, Yves, 2022. "Competing for narrative authority in capital markets: Activist short sellers vs. financial analysts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Dambra, Michael & Field, Laura Casares & Gustafson, Matthew T. & Pisciotta, Kevin, 2018. "The consequences to analyst involvement in the IPO process: Evidence surrounding the JOBS Act," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 302-330.
    7. Constable, Philip & Kuasirikun, Nooch, 2020. "From cosmological to commercial form: A Buddhist theory of ‘form’, ‘space’ and ‘stream of re-becoming’ in mid-19th century Thai accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Raj Aggarwal & Dev Mishra & Craig Wilson, 2018. "Analyst recommendations and the implied cost of equity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 717-743, April.
    9. Lin Peng & Siew Hong Teoh & Yakun Wang & Jiawen Yan, 2022. "Face Value: Trait Impressions, Performance Characteristics, and Market Outcomes for Financial Analysts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 653-705, May.
    10. Chen, Lei & Danbolt, Jo & Holland, John, 2018. "Information about bank intangibles, analyst information intermediation, and the role of knowledge and social forces in the ‘market for information’," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 261-276.
    11. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Liu, Liuling & Wu, Qiang & Zhao, Yijiang, 2021. "Financial analysts' career concerns and the cost of private debt," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Thabang Mokoaleli-Mokoteli & Richard J. Taffler & Vineet Agarwal, 2009. "Behavioural Bias and Conflicts of Interest in Analyst Stock Recommendations," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3-4), pages 384-418.
    13. Hou, Jianlei & Zhao, Shangmei & Yang, Haijun, 2020. "Individual analysts, stock return synchronicity and information efficiency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Birru, Justin & Gokkaya, Sinan & Liu, Xi & Stulz, Rene M., 2019. "Are Analyst Trade Ideas Valuable?," Working Paper Series 2019-15, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
    15. Yen-Cheng Chang & Alexander Ljungqvist & Kevin Tseng & Itay Goldstein, 2023. "Do Corporate Disclosures Constrain Strategic Analyst Behavior?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(8), pages 3163-3212.
    16. Pieter de Jong & Lakshmi Goel, 2016. "The influence of security analysts on CEO pay cuts," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 26-52, February.
    17. Tiana Lehmer & Ben Lourie & Devin Shanthikumar, 2022. "Brokerage trading volume and analysts’ earnings forecasts: a conflict of interest?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 441-476, June.
    18. Warren, Liz & Jack, Lisa, 2018. "The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - A strategic conduct analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 481-496.
    19. Jagjeev Dosanjh, 2017. "Exchange Initiatives and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Australian Securities Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2017, January-A.
    20. Tsang, Albert & Xiang, Yi & Yu, Li, 2023. "Cross-border regulatory cooperation and analyst forecasts," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:5:s0890838921000032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.