IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v24y1992i4p331-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The contagion effect in performance evaluation: Evidence from the evaluations of marketing managers: A research note

Author

Listed:
  • Barrett, T.F.
  • McDonagh, P.
  • Granleese, J.

Abstract

In the evaluation of managerial performance ‘contagion’ is considered to exist where a superior, in evaluating the performance of a subordinate, applies the same criteria as are applied to the evaluation of his/her own performance. The findings of the empirical studies which have sought to establish whether contagion does exist are ambiguous (De Coster & Fertakis, 1968; Hopwood, 1973). Merchant (1985) argues that such ambiguity may result from the highly aggregated measurement systems used. Using unaggregated measures the results of a survey of 72 senior marketing managers were analysed. Each manager was asked to rank the usage made of seven factors in the evaluation of the performance of their subordinates, and also to rank the usage of the same seven factors in the evaluation of his/her own performance. Two of the factors chosen were accounting orientated i.e. they necessitated information provided by the accounting information system, the other five factors were non-accounting orientated i.e. they could not be evaluated on the basis of information provided by the accounting information system. Rank correlation was then utilised to establish if contagion existed for each of the factors. For six of the seven factors, significant and positive associations were found to exist among the rankings, which is evidence of the existence of contagion, not only on the accounting-based factors but also on the non-accounting based ones. There is also evidence of significant negative association between one of the accounting-based factors and a number of the non-accounting based ones. The extent to which contagion is found to exist within this study, by contrast to the ambiguous results of previous studies, is likely explained by the measurement system used. Within this study non-aggregative measurement systems are utilised, and it is suggested, following Merchant (1985) that such an approach has significant benefits to the study of the factors associated with the criteria used in the evaluation of managerial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrett, T.F. & McDonagh, P. & Granleese, J., 1992. "The contagion effect in performance evaluation: Evidence from the evaluations of marketing managers: A research note," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 331-341.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:24:y:1992:i:4:p:331-341
    DOI: 10.1016/S0890-8389(05)80042-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838905800423
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0890-8389(05)80042-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Briers, Michael & Hirst, Mark, 1990. "The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 373-398.
    2. Merchant, Kenneth A., 1985. "Organizational controls and discretionary program decision making: A field study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 67-85, January.
    3. Brownell, P, 1985. "Budgetary Systems And The Control Of Functionally Differentiated Organizational Activities," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 502-512.
    4. Decoster, Dt & Fertakis, Jp, 1968. "Budget-Induced Pressure And Its Relationship To Supervisory Behavior," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 237-246.
    5. Govindarajan, V., 1984. "Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 125-135, June.
    6. Hopwood, Ag, 1972. "Empirical Study Of Role Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10, pages 156-182.
    7. Hirst, Mk, 1983. "Reliance On Accounting Performance-Measures, Task Uncertainty, And Dysfunctional Behavior - Some Extensions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 596-605.
    8. Otley, Dt, 1978. "Budget Use And Managerial Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 122-149.
    9. Simons, Robert, 1987. "Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 357-374, June.
    10. Hopwood, Ag, 1972. "Empirical Study Of Role Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation - Reply," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10, pages 189-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    2. Vincent K. Chong & Lokman Mia & John Sands & Zhichao Alex Wang, 2023. "The effect of nonfinancial performance measures, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning on innovation performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 201-233, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    2. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    3. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    4. Chapman, Christopher S., 1997. "Reflections on a contingent view of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 189-205, February.
    5. Vagneur, K. & Peiperl, M., 2000. "Reconsidering performance evaluative style," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 511-525, May.
    6. Otley, David & Fakiolas, Alexander, 2000. "Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 497-510, May.
    7. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    8. Klaus Derfuss, 2015. "Relating Context Variables to Participative Budgeting and Evaluative Use of Performance Measures: A Meta-analysis," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 238-278, June.
    9. Chong Lau & Christen Buckland, 2000. "Budget emphasis, participation, task difficulty and performance: the effect of diversity within culture," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 37-55.
    10. R. Murray Lindsay, 1994. "Publication System Biases Associated with the Statistical Testing Paradigm," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 33-57, June.
    11. Sarah A. Hinchliffe, 2019. "A Focus on ‘Control’: Reconciling Contemporary Transaction Cost Economics with Behavioural Contingency Accounting Perspectives," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(2), pages 189-189, May.
    12. Jan Noeverman & Bas A.S. Koene & Roger Williams, 2005. "Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 77-107, April.
    13. Lau, Chong M. & Low, Liang C. & Eggleton, Ian R. C., 1995. "The impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 359-381, July.
    14. Löning, Hélène & Besson, M. & Mendoza, Carla, 2008. "Dual use of budgeting in uncertainty contexts: Explorative study of senior sales and marketing managers," HEC Research Papers Series 897, HEC Paris.
    15. David Emsley & Lai Hong Chung, 2010. "How Management Accountants' Cognitive Style and Role Involvement Combine to Affect the Effort Devoted to Initiating Change," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(3), pages 232-257, September.
    16. Littkemann, Jörn, 1997. "Erfolgreiche Gestaltung unternehmensinterner Abrechnungssysteme," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 436, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    17. Lal, Mohan & Dunk, Alan S. & Smith, Gregory D., 1996. "The propensity of managers to create budgetary slack: A cross-national re-examination using random sampling," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 483-496.
    18. Marginson, David & Ogden, Stuart, 2005. "Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers' budgeting behaviours," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 435-456, July.
    19. Noeverman, J., 2010. "Within- and Between-group Agreement in Supervisor’s Evaluative Behaviours: Do evaluative ‘styles’ exist?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-002-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark & Chen, Clara Xiaoling, 2005. "Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 655-684.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:24:y:1992:i:4:p:331-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.