IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v17y2009i3p154-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘geographical affiliations’ in ‘top’ research journals of general marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Svensson, Göran
  • Tronvoll, Bård
  • Helgesson, Thomas
  • Slåtten, Terje

Abstract

The objective is to explore the geographical affiliation of author(s), ad hoc reviewer(s), editorial board(s) and editor(s) of selected journals in marketing. The sample used in our study was restricted to papers published in six research-oriented journals in general marketing, which were selected to represent the ‘top’ publications in this field. The ‘geographical affiliations’ of authors, ad hoc reviewers, editorial boards and editors, reveals a predominance of the North American affiliations in all the selected ‘top’ research journals of general marketing. The ‘geographical affiliations’ of author(s), ad hoc reviewer(s), editorial board(s) and editor(s) is a subject so far unexplored across top marketing journals. It is however an important issue that needs to be raised in literature, due to the influences that they may have on the journal and its content, and the characteristics of published papers. The study provides insights into the ‘top’ research journals in general marketing. We intend to complement the current knowledge and insights in literature by studying four components of the ‘geographical affiliations’ of ‘top’ journals in general marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Svensson, Göran & Tronvoll, Bård & Helgesson, Thomas & Slåtten, Terje, 2009. "The ‘geographical affiliations’ in ‘top’ research journals of general marketing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 154-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:17:y:2009:i:3:p:154-159
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358209000330
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clive Beed & Cara Beed, 1996. "Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 369-396, March.
    2. Thomas E. Nisonger, 1999. "JASIS and library and information science journal rankings: A review and analysis of the last half‐century," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(11), pages 1004-1019.
    3. Michael Fields, D. & Swayne, Linda E., 1991. "Contribution of southern authors in major marketing publications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 33-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polonsky, Michael Jay & Kay, Pandora & Ringer, Allison, 2013. "A review of the first twenty years of the Australasian Marketing Journal," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 176-186.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justus Haucap & Johannes Muck, 2015. "What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 849-877, June.
    2. Powers, Thomas L. & Swan, John E. & Bos, Theodore & Patton, John Frank, 1998. "Career Research Productivity Patterns of Marketing Academicians," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 75-86, May.
    3. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem & Steve Uytbergen, 2008. "A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 61-90, October.
    4. Chad Albrecht & Jeffery Thompson & Jeffrey Hoopes & Pablo Rodrigo, 2010. "Business Ethics Journal Rankings as Perceived by Business Ethics Scholars," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 227-237, August.
    5. Mladen Andreis & Maja Jokić, 2008. "An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975–2001," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(2), pages 263-288, May.
    6. Wen-Yau Cathy Lin, 2012. "Research status and characteristics of library and information science in Taiwan: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 7-21, July.
    7. Chiang Kao & Hsiou-Wei Lin & San-Lin Chung & Wei-Chi Tsai & Jyh-Shen Chiou & Yen-Liang Chen & Liang-Hsuan Chen & Shih-Chieh Fang & Hwei-Lan Pao, 2008. "Ranking Taiwanese management journals: A case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(1), pages 95-115, July.
    8. Chien Hsiang Liao & Mu-Yen Chen, 2018. "Exploring knowledge patterns of library and information science journals within the field: a citation analysis from 2009 to 2016," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1991-2008, December.
    9. Vastag, Gyula & Montabon, Frank, 2002. "Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 109-126, April.
    10. Chiang Kao, 2009. "The authorship and internationality of Industrial Engineering journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 123-136, October.
    11. Michael Bräuninger & Justus Haucap, 2003. "Reputation and Relevance of Economics Journals," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 175-197, May.
    12. Carlos R. Azzoni, 2010. "Making a Great Difference: The Influence of Professor Werner Baer on the Economic Literature in Brazil, and on Brazil," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Hadi Salehi Esfahani & Giovanni Facchini & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings (ed.), Economic Development in Latin America, chapter 19, pages 295-305, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. David L. Anderson & John Tressler, 2013. "The New Zealand performance-based research fund and its impact on publication activity in economics," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 1-11, September.
    14. Thorsten Hennig-Thurau & Gianfranco Walsh & Ulf Schrader, 2004. "VHB-JOURQUAL: Ein Ranking von betriebswirtschaftlich-relevanten Zeitschriften auf der Grundlage von Expertenurteilen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 520-545, September.
    15. William A. Jackson, 2018. "Strategic Pluralism and Monism in Heterodox Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 237-251, June.
    16. Thomas Lange, 2006. "The Imprecise Science of Evaluating Scholarly Performance," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 505-532, August.
    17. Matthias Sutter & Martin G. Kocher, 2001. "Tools for Evaluating Research Output," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(5), pages 555-566, October.
    18. Rodrigo Costas & Thed N. Leeuwen & Anthony F. J. Raan, 2011. "The “Mendel syndrome” in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(1), pages 177-205, October.
    19. Daria Maltseva & Vladimir Batagelj, 2020. "iMetrics: the development of the discipline with many names," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 313-359, October.
    20. Todd D. Kendall, 2008. "Ability and specialization among economic researchers," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), pages 609-618.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:17:y:2009:i:3:p:154-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.